aicoder.com · Best AI coder, ranked and priced

Which AI should write your code?

Live coding leaderboards, verified API cost, and the model + agent stack that actually ships. Zero paid placements.

Popular:
  • 128models tracked
  • 21vendors
  • 40plans compared
  • 5hlast check
⚡ 30-Second AI Coding Decision Engine

Which AI Coding Stack Should I Use?

Enter your tech stack, task, and budget to calculate the optimal setup and estimated monthly cost in 30 seconds.

4h / day
1h (Light)4h (Std)8h (Heavy)
🥇 Primary: Best Modern Performance StackPeak Productivity
Claude Sonnet 5by Anthropic
⚡ Recommended Stack: Cursor Pro ($20/mo) + Claude Sonnet 5
  • Adaptive Thinking delivers state-of-the-art multi-file refactoring and type safety
  • Deeply optimized across modern IDE harnesses with near-zero code hallucination
  • Slashing input to $2.0 / output to $10.0 makes it the definitive flagship standard
Estimated Monthly Cost $118 ~ $202 / mo

Subscribe to Cursor Pro ($20/mo), with API key for overflow

🥈 Alternative: Ultra High Value StackSave ~84%
💰 Ultra-Saver Stack: Cursor Pro ($20/mo) + Gemini 3.7 Flash
  • Ultra-low cost at $0.15 / 1M input & $0.60 / 1M output
  • Native 1M token context window ideal for full codebase ingestion
  • Top-tier performance per dollar, excelling at everyday code and unit tests
Estimated Monthly Cost $26 ~ $32 / mo

Plug direct API keys for heavy daily code review without financial anxiety

💡 Architectural Recommendation: Adopt a tiered routing strategy—delegate 80% of routine completions and tests to Gemini 3.7 Flash, and switch to Claude Sonnet 5 for deep refactoring and hard concurrency bugs to achieve peak output at minimal cost.

Today's AI Coding Pulse

LIVE RADAR

Real-time tracker of price cuts, new model drops, and context expansions across the AI landscape.

View All 47+ Updates
📉 Price Cut@arena

LMArena: Gemini 3.8 Flash hits Agent Arena Pareto first time at $0.22 median/task

Arena.ai (@arena) says Google DeepMind’s Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) put Gemini on the Agent Arena Pareto frontier for the first time: $0.75/$3.75 per MTok, ~$0.22 median cost per Agent Arena task with +5.94% net gain—on par with Grok 4.5 and GLM 5.2 (Max) at roughly 44–50% lower price.

🔥 Trending@arena

LMArena: Fable 5.1 quality-vs-price head-to-head vs Opus 5, GPT-5.6 and more

Arena.ai (@arena) highlights @petergostev’s head-to-head: Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Qwen-3.8, Grok-4.6, and DeepSeek across coding, 3D, SVG, research, and data-viz—with generation costs from cents to $65+—so developers can weigh quality vs price.

🔥 Trending@cursor_ai

Cursor cloud agents can now run on your own infrastructure with auto-scaling pools

Cursor (@cursor_ai) announces cloud agents can now run on your infrastructure, including pools of machines that automatically scale with demand. Agents can reach internal services or specialized hardware while the agent loop stays in Cursor.

🔥 Trending@ArtificialAnlys

Artificial Analysis: Muse Spark 1.3 hits Index 62 with leading agentic cost efficiency

Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys) benchmarks Meta Muse Spark 1.3: the xhigh variant scores 61 on the Intelligence Index (up 4 from 1.2’s 57), while limited-preview max reaches 62, trailing only Claude Fable/Opus lines. Gains are mainly agentic and scientific; xhigh is the lowest cost-per-task among models at 59+ (~$0.55) at unchanged $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens.

Interactive Showcase

Benchmark, Compare, and Supercharge

From unbiased pass-rate benchmarks to transparent pricing matrices and copy-paste rules.

RankModel / LabCursorBench Pass RateAPI Input / 1MContext WindowAction
#1Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
75.6%
$10.001M Compare →
#2Claude Fable 5Anthropic
72.9%
$10.001M Compare →
#3Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
71.8%
$0.751.0M Compare →
#4Grok 4.6xAI
69.9%
$2.00500K Compare →
#5Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
68.4%
$0.751.0M Compare →
#6GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
67.2%
$5.001M Compare →
Live desk

What the numbers say right now

Just landed on the desk.

New flagships, official numbers, source-linked. Not a press-release dump — the rows you can actually call.

Google2026-08-13

Gemini 3.7 Flash

CursorBench #3 · $0.75 / $3.75 intro

$0.75/1M1.0M context
Zhipu AI2026-08-14

GLM-5.3

+50% coding vs GLM-5.2 on Z.ai Code Bench

$1.4/1M1M context
See in pricing →

Cheapest coding models

Tagged coding, sorted by input $ / 1M

  1. 01Phi-4Microsoft · 16K$0.07
  2. 02Doubao Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance · 256K$0.08
  3. 03Mistral Small 4Mistral AI · 131K$0.10
  4. 04Hunyuan-TurboSTencent · 128K$0.11
  5. 05Doubao 1.5 ProByteDance · 131K$0.11
  6. 06Hunyuan-T1Tencent · 128K$0.14
Full pricing table →

Vendors on the desk

Models tracked per lab

  • Google19
  • OpenAI16
  • Anthropic13
  • Qwen12
  • DeepSeek10
  • Zhipu AI8
  • xAI7
  • Moonshot AI7
Cost Simulation

How Much Will My Monthly Dev Bill Cost?

Simulate monthly token volume and compare flat-rate plans vs pay-as-you-go API costs

Quick Presets:
Monthly Input Tokens (Prompt)2 M tokens
Monthly Output Tokens (Completion)0.5 M tokens
DeepSeek-V3 API (PayG)Lowest Cost
$0.42/ mo
Gemini 3.7 Flash API (PayG)Best Value
$3.38/ mo
Cursor Pro (Flat Rate)Daily Driver
$20.00/ mo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet API (Direct)Top Capability
$13.50/ mo
How

How the data stays honest

01

Edited by humans

All data lives in a JSON file in our public git repo. Every change is a PR, fully audited.

02

Verified by robots

A daily script fetches each vendor's pricing page and confirms our numbers still appear in it.

03

Flagged when stale

If a vendor changes their page and verification fails, the row gets a yellow badge and the failure reason is shown.

04

No paid placement

Vendors cannot pay to be added, removed, or re-ranked. There is no advertising. The site is funded by the operating company.