aicoder.com ยท Best AI coder, ranked and priced

Which AI should write your code?

Live coding leaderboards, verified API cost, and the model + agent stack that actually ships. Zero paid placements.

Popular:
  • 126models tracked
  • 21vendors
  • 40plans compared
  • 6hlast check
โšก 30-Second AI Coding Decision Engine

Which AI Coding Stack Should I Use?

Enter your tech stack, task, and budget to calculate the optimal setup and estimated monthly cost in 30 seconds.

4h / day
1h (Light)4h (Std)8h (Heavy)
๐Ÿฅ‡ Primary: Best Modern Performance StackPeak Productivity
Claude Sonnet 5by Anthropic
โšก Recommended Stack: Cursor Pro ($20/mo) + Claude Sonnet 5
  • โœ“Adaptive Thinking delivers state-of-the-art multi-file refactoring and type safety
  • โœ“Deeply optimized across modern IDE harnesses with near-zero code hallucination
  • โœ“Slashing input to $2.0 / output to $10.0 makes it the definitive flagship standard
Estimated Monthly Cost $118 ~ $202 / mo

Subscribe to Cursor Pro ($20/mo), with API key for overflow

๐Ÿฅˆ Alternative: Ultra High Value StackSave ~84%
๐Ÿ’ฐ Ultra-Saver Stack: Cursor Pro ($20/mo) + Gemini 3.7 Flash
  • โœ“Ultra-low cost at $0.15 / 1M input & $0.60 / 1M output
  • โœ“Native 1M token context window ideal for full codebase ingestion
  • โœ“Top-tier performance per dollar, excelling at everyday code and unit tests
Estimated Monthly Cost $26 ~ $32 / mo

Plug direct API keys for heavy daily code review without financial anxiety

๐Ÿ’ก Architectural Recommendation: Adopt a tiered routing strategyโ€”delegate 80% of routine completions and tests to Gemini 3.7 Flash, and switch to Claude Sonnet 5 for deep refactoring and hard concurrency bugs to achieve peak output at minimal cost.

Today's AI Coding Pulse

LIVE RADAR

Real-time tracker of price cuts, new model drops, and context expansions across the AI landscape.

View All 47+ Updatesโ†’
๐Ÿ”ฅ Trending@cursor_ai

Cursor ships Claude Fable 5.1; tops CursorBench 3.2 at 73.4%

Cursor said Claude Fable 5.1 is now available in the editor and is the strongest model it has run on CursorBench 3.2, scoring 73.4% at max effort. The post highlights strong self-verification, which helps it finish hard coding tasks end to endโ€”an IDE-side landing the same day as the Fable 5.1 launch.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Trending@ClaudeDevs

Anthropic tightens Messages API: no pre-thinking edits on new Fable 5.1 accounts

ClaudeDevs said the Messages API will block editing Claude's context before thinking blocks in multi-turn chats, to harden against distillation that extracts chain-of-thought. The change applies first only to new accounts on Fable 5.1 (distillation often spins up many fake accounts), with plans to extend it to all users on future releases while looking for longer-term fixes.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Trending@ClaudeDevs

ClaudeDevs: Fable 5.1 live in Claude Code; 55.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0

Anthropic's developer account said Claude Fable 5.1 is live in Claude Code and on the Claude Platform at the same list price as Fable 5 with 75% cheaper API cache reads. In the same thread it reported Terminal-Bench 4.0 scores in Claude Code: Fable 5.1 at 55.8%, ahead of Fable 5 at 42% and Opus 5 at 52.3%, and said it leads both on agentic coding and computer-use evals.

๐Ÿš€ Release@FirstSquawk

Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.1; cache reads $0.25, ~25% cheaper typical jobs

Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5.1 on September 1 (API id claude-fable-5-1) for Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise, plus the Claude API, AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Foundry. List price stays $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens, but cache reads drop to $0.25 (75% less than Fable 5), which Anthropic estimates cuts typical workloads about 25% and highly agentic ones up to about 45%. Claude Mythos 5.1 remains limited to trusted-access programs.

Interactive Showcase

Benchmark, Compare, and Supercharge

From unbiased pass-rate benchmarks to transparent pricing matrices and copy-paste rules.

RankModel / LabCursorBench Pass RateAPI Input / 1MContext WindowAction
#1Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
75.6%
$10.001M Compare โ†’
#2Claude Fable 5Anthropic
72.9%
$10.001M Compare โ†’
#3Grok 4.6xAI
69.9%
$2.00500K Compare โ†’
#4Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
68.4%
$0.751.0M Compare โ†’
#5GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
67.2%
$5.001M Compare โ†’
#6Grok 4.5xAI
66.7%
$2.00500K Compare โ†’
Live desk

What the numbers say right now

Just landed on the desk.

New flagships, official numbers, source-linked. Not a press-release dump โ€” the rows you can actually call.

Google2026-08-13

Gemini 3.7 Flash

CursorBench #3 ยท $0.75 / $3.75 intro

$0.75/1M1.0M context
Zhipu AI2026-08-14

GLM-5.3

+50% coding vs GLM-5.2 on Z.ai Code Bench

$1.4/1M1M context
See in pricing โ†’

Cheapest coding models

Tagged coding, sorted by input $ / 1M

  1. 01Phi-4Microsoft ยท 16K$0.07
  2. 02Doubao Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance ยท 256K$0.08
  3. 03Mistral Small 4Mistral AI ยท 131K$0.10
  4. 04Hunyuan-TurboSTencent ยท 128K$0.11
  5. 05Doubao 1.5 ProByteDance ยท 131K$0.11
  6. 06Hunyuan-T1Tencent ยท 128K$0.14
Full pricing table โ†’

Vendors on the desk

Models tracked per lab

  • Google17
  • OpenAI16
  • Anthropic13
  • Qwen12
  • DeepSeek10
  • Zhipu AI8
  • xAI7
  • Moonshot AI7
Cost Simulation

How Much Will My Monthly Dev Bill Cost?

Simulate monthly token volume and compare flat-rate plans vs pay-as-you-go API costs

Quick Presets:
Monthly Input Tokens (Prompt)2 M tokens
Monthly Output Tokens (Completion)0.5 M tokens
DeepSeek-V3 API (PayG)Lowest Cost
$0.42/ mo
Gemini 3.7 Flash API (PayG)Best Value
$3.38/ mo
Cursor Pro (Flat Rate)Daily Driver
$20.00/ mo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet API (Direct)Top Capability
$13.50/ mo
How

How the data stays honest

01

Edited by humans

All data lives in a JSON file in our public git repo. Every change is a PR, fully audited.

02

Verified by robots

A daily script fetches each vendor's pricing page and confirms our numbers still appear in it.

03

Flagged when stale

If a vendor changes their page and verification fails, the row gets a yellow badge and the failure reason is shown.

04

No paid placement

Vendors cannot pay to be added, removed, or re-ranked. There is no advertising. The site is funded by the operating company.