Gemini 3.7 Flash
CursorBench #3 · $0.75 / $3.75 intro
Live coding leaderboards, verified API cost, and the model + agent stack that actually ships. Zero paid placements.
Enter your tech stack, task, and budget to calculate the optimal setup and estimated monthly cost in 30 seconds.
Subscribe to Cursor Pro ($20/mo), with API key for overflow
Plug direct API keys for heavy daily code review without financial anxiety
Real-time tracker of price cuts, new model drops, and context expansions across the AI landscape.
Arena.ai (@arena) says Google DeepMind’s Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) put Gemini on the Agent Arena Pareto frontier for the first time: $0.75/$3.75 per MTok, ~$0.22 median cost per Agent Arena task with +5.94% net gain—on par with Grok 4.5 and GLM 5.2 (Max) at roughly 44–50% lower price.
Arena.ai (@arena) highlights @petergostev’s head-to-head: Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Qwen-3.8, Grok-4.6, and DeepSeek across coding, 3D, SVG, research, and data-viz—with generation costs from cents to $65+—so developers can weigh quality vs price.
Cursor (@cursor_ai) announces cloud agents can now run on your infrastructure, including pools of machines that automatically scale with demand. Agents can reach internal services or specialized hardware while the agent loop stays in Cursor.
Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys) benchmarks Meta Muse Spark 1.3: the xhigh variant scores 61 on the Intelligence Index (up 4 from 1.2’s 57), while limited-preview max reaches 62, trailing only Claude Fable/Opus lines. Gains are mainly agentic and scientific; xhigh is the lowest cost-per-task among models at 59+ (~$0.55) at unchanged $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens.
Instant recommendations for model pairings, top plans, and estimated monthly costs for your exact workflow.
Fast code completion, function refactors, and full multi-language daily development.
Complex codebase indexing, sandbox execution, cross-file refactors, and chain-of-thought reasoning.
Direct pay-as-you-go API calls, self-hosted gateways, cutting token bills by up to 80% without losing quality.
Centralized billing, multi-seat governance, zero data retention for training, and SLA backing.
From unbiased pass-rate benchmarks to transparent pricing matrices and copy-paste rules.
| Rank | Model / Lab | CursorBench Pass Rate | API Input / 1M | Context Window | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | $10.00 | 1M | Compare → | |
| #2 | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | $10.00 | 1M | Compare → | |
| #3 | Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | 1.0M | Compare → | |
| #4 | Grok 4.6xAI | $2.00 | 500K | Compare → | |
| #5 | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | 1.0M | Compare → | |
| #6 | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | $5.00 | 1M | Compare → |
New flagships, official numbers, source-linked. Not a press-release dump — the rows you can actually call.
CursorBench #3 · $0.75 / $3.75 intro
+50% coding vs GLM-5.2 on Z.ai Code Bench
Tagged coding, sorted by input $ / 1M
Models tracked per lab
Simulate monthly token volume and compare flat-rate plans vs pay-as-you-go API costs
Every page is generated from a JSON file in our public git repo. Every row links back to the vendor's own pricing or release page.
We mirror LMArena, CursorBench, Aider, LiveCodeBench and more. Their ranking, our table — no composite score.
Overseas and domestic Code / Agent / Token plans in one matrix. Wizard, filters, and a cost calculator.
Input / output cost per million tokens, context window, status. Auto-verified daily against vendor pages.
Machine-readable /api/v1 for models, pricing, plans, and leaderboards. Built for agents, not just browsers.
All data lives in a JSON file in our public git repo. Every change is a PR, fully audited.
A daily script fetches each vendor's pricing page and confirms our numbers still appear in it.
If a vendor changes their page and verification fails, the row gets a yellow badge and the failure reason is shown.
Vendors cannot pay to be added, removed, or re-ranked. There is no advertising. The site is funded by the operating company.