Benchmark8d ago
Artificial Analysis launches AA-Robotics v0.1: coding agents drive a real robot arm, GPT-6 Astra leads at 69.4
Artificial Analysis released AA-Robotics v0.1 on 2026-10-14, a research preview in which frontier models running inside coding-agent harnesses (Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity) control a 6-axis robot arm over an HTTP API across eight tabletop tasks. GPT-6 Astra scores 69.4, ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (64.6), Gemini 4 Argon (55.3), Claude Opus 5.5 (48.8) and Claude Fable 5.1 (46.3). Models take about 30 minutes per task versus roughly 20 seconds for a human.
Benchmark48d ago
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2: Fable 5.1 leads, Astra second
Artificial Analysis shipped Intelligence Index v4.2: adds private agentic knowledge-work eval AA-Briefcase and long-document GDP.pdf, doubles held-out weighting, upgrades grading, and drops saturated GPQA Diamond. Claude Fable 5.1 leads; GPT-6 Astra is second with ~4pt gain over GPT-5.6 Sol and strong output-token Pareto efficiency. A major interim benchmark refresh for model selection and cost/quality tradeoffs.
Benchmark3d ago
Artificial Analysis launches HealthBench and HealthBench Professional leaderboards: GPT-6 Astra leads clinician conversations at 66.0%, while Claude Opus 5.5 tops the raw score but falls to sixth after the length penalty
On October 19 independent evaluator Artificial Analysis launched two health-conversation leaderboards built on OpenAI's HealthBench (5,000 realistic health conversations) and HealthBench Professional (525 clinician conversations), graded against physician-written rubrics and reported as both raw and OpenAI-style length-adjusted scores. On Professional, GPT-6 Astra (max) leads at 66.0% length-adjusted, ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (65.1%) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (63.0%); Claude Opus 5.5 has the top raw score (71.4%) but drops to sixth (59.9%) because its ~5,900-character answers are penalized. On HealthBench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads at 62.1%, with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash close behind at 60.9% for about 1/16 of the cost per task.
Discussion & Comments
0Sign in to join the discussion
Connect with AI developers to exchange benchmark insights.