AI Coding Live News

Together AI Launches Together Compiler: Agents Continually Optimize Production Inference, Up to 2.6x Higher TPS

On November 4 Together AI launched Together Compiler (TKCC), which pairs a swarm of AI agents with a persistent inference engine to keep rewriting inference kernels for real traffic, models and hardware, as part of what it calls Polymorphic Inference. The company says that within 24 hours it reached up to 2.6x higher TPS on models such as Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, MiniMax M3.1-Flash and DeepSeek v4.1-Flash, up to 50% faster on customer workloads, and it already serves trillions of tokens a day in production.

Key Takeaways

  • Together Compiler recasts inference optimization from a classic compiler problem into an agentic search: agents propose kernel changes, a persistent engine checks speed and correctness, and only verified changes reach production
  • Together says that within 24 hours it reached up to 2.6x higher TPS on Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, MiniMax M3.1-Flash and DeepSeek v4.1-Flash, and up to 50% faster on customer workloads
  • On InferenceX low-latency batch size 1 it reports 1,111 TPS on MiniMax M3.1-Flash and 1,205 TPS on DeepSeek v4.1-Flash (company-reported); SemiAnalysis said it validated one of the results
  • The persistent engine hot-reloads candidate forward passes, cutting time to serving to 9 seconds versus 467 seconds for restarting an engine, with 252x higher experiment throughput than baseline agentic optimization systems
  • It already serves trillions of tokens a day in Together's production stack, where 40+ models are now optimized by agents
Read full story

Artificial Analysis Makes Time per Task Its Headline Performance Metric: GPT-6 Astra Finishes a Max-Effort Task in About 17 Minutes, Ahead of Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon

Independent benchmarker Artificial Analysis announced on X on November 4 (17:34 UTC) a new version of its API performance benchmarking: the headline metric moves from output speed to Time per Task, the time to finish one Intelligence Index task (output tokens per task divided by end-to-end output speed). It covers about 1,000 serverless endpoints, measures speed from sending the request to the final token, and adds multi-turn agentic coding and knowledge-work workloads. Per its data, GPT-6 Astra at max effort runs at 51 tokens/s yet finishes a task in about 17 minutes, against about 26 for Claude Opus 5.5 (max) and about 29 for Gemini 4 Carbon (high).

Key Takeaways

  • Time per Task equals output tokens per Intelligence Index task divided by end-to-end output speed, so a model that is fast per token but verbose can finish later than a slower model that uses fewer tokens.
  • End-to-end output speed runs from sending the request to the final token, including the wait before the first token (prefill and hidden reasoning); output tokens now come from each provider's API-reported counts instead of the o200k_base tokenizer.
  • GPT-6 Astra (max) runs at 51 tokens/s with about 50k output tokens per task and takes about 17 minutes; Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 111 tokens/s) takes about 26 minutes and Gemini 4 Carbon (high, 71 tokens/s) about 29, using roughly 120k to 170k tokens per task.
  • At each lab's API default effort (medium for all three), GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol and Opus 5.5 cut Time per Task by about 3 to 5x and Cost per Task by about 2 to 4x, scoring about 5 to 11 points lower; Opus 5.5 drops from about 26 minutes and $10.04 to about 6.8 minutes and $2.45.
  • The official methodology page lists this as version 3.0.0 (October 30), with runs now every 6 hours and a new endpoint error rate metric.
Read full story

Ricursive Open-Sources Ripple-65B Preview: A 65B Dense Model Pretrained From Scratch, TerminalBench 2.1 80.5, Apache 2.0

Ricursive Intelligence released its first model, Ripple-65B Preview, on November 4 (18:24 UTC), open-sourcing the instruction-tuned model (BF16 and NVFP4) and a base model on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0. The official model card describes a 65B dense Transformer pretrained on 12T tokens with up to 1M context, and self-reports TerminalBench 2.1 80.5, SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard 79.1 and DeepSWE 1.1 44.3, ahead of much larger US open-weight models on agentic coding. It fits on local hardware such as the DGX Spark. CEO Anna Goldie says it cost about a tenth of the prior comparable state of the art.

Ricursive Open-Sources Ripple-65B Preview: A 65B Dense Model Pretrained From Scratch, TerminalBench 2.1 80.5, Apache 2.0

Key Takeaways

  • Ripple-65B Preview is a 65B dense model with a thin-and-deep shape (80 layers, d_model 5120), moving from an Olmo 3 baseline to a Gemma 3N-like architecture.
  • It was pretrained on 12T tokens at 8K sequence length, then went through mid-training, long-context training, SFT and mixed-domain RL, with up to 1M context.
  • Self-reported TerminalBench 2.1 is 80.5, above Reflection Beam 501B (80.1) and Muse Spark Open 816B (76.4), but SWE-bench Verified 76.5 and DeepSWE 1.1 44.3 show it does not lead everywhere.
  • Ricursive says the core team grew from one to five people and code compute efficiency improved 16x versus the Olmo 3 ladder; it reaches about 250 tok/s on 2x B200.
  • Hugging Face hosts BF16, NVFP4, base and DFlash2 speculative-decoding checkpoints, all under Apache 2.0.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Ripple-65B Preview⚡ Reflection Beam 501B⚡ Muse Spark Open⚡ Nemotron 3 Ultra🌐 Ricursive Intelligence🌐 NVIDIA

Cognition Launches SWE-2 Flash: A Fast Coding Model Built on Inkling-Small, 200 tok/s at One-Fifth the Price of SWE-2

Cognition released SWE-2 Flash on November 4 (19:55 UTC). Its official blog says the model is built on Thinking Machines' Inkling-Small (276B total, 12B active parameters) and, for the first time, adds a large mid-training stage before reinforcement learning, lifting FrontierCode 2.0 from 3.2% to 24.0% and Terminal-Bench 4.0 from 0.9% to 20.0%. Cognition says it beats every American open-weight model. It generates about 200 tokens per second at one-fifth the price and 3x the speed of SWE-2, and is free for Pro, Max and Teams users in Devin Desktop and CLI until the end of November. Weights are not public; a secure sharing program for partners and researchers is planned.

Cognition Launches SWE-2 Flash: A Fast Coding Model Built on Inkling-Small, 200 tok/s at One-Fifth the Price of SWE-2

Key Takeaways

  • SWE-2 Flash is built on Thinking Machines' Inkling-Small, with 276B total and 12B active parameters, about one-tenth the size of SWE-2 (2.8T-A104B).
  • Training adds a three-stage mid-training run on a few trillion tokens of scientific articles, blogs, code and other sources, followed by large-scale RL with higher-quality and more diverse tasks.
  • Official scores: FrontierCode 2.0 24.0 (SWE-2 scores 23.8), DeepSWE 1.1 60.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1 89.2, SWE-Bench Pro v2 Hard 89.9 and Terminal-Bench 4.0 20.0.
  • It runs at about 200 tokens per second versus about 60 for SWE-2, at one-fifth the price, and is free for Pro, Max and Teams users in Devin Desktop and CLI through November.
  • Citing cyber risk, the weights are not openly released; Cognition says details of a secure weight-access program will follow in the coming weeks.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ SWE-2 Flash⚡ SWE-2⚡ Inkling-Small🤖 Devin🌐 Cognition🌐 Thinking Machines
ADSponsored

Moonshot Releases Kimi K3.1 Pro Open Weights on Hugging Face: 2.8T-Parameter, 104B-Active MoE in MXFP4 at About 1.56TB, Custom License Limits Large Model-as-a-Service Use

The official Kimi account @Kimi_Moonshot announced the Kimi K3.1 Pro model weights at 16:00 UTC on November 4; the moonshotai/Kimi-K3.1-Pro repository is public and not gated. The model card describes a natively multimodal MoE with 2.8T total and 104B active parameters and a 1M-token context, shipped as MXFP4 weights from quantization-aware training, about 1.56TB in total; vLLM, SGLang and TokenSpeed are the recommended engines. The license allows free use and modification, but Model-as-a-Service businesses with over $20M in annual revenue need a separate agreement.

Moonshot Releases Kimi K3.1 Pro Open Weights on Hugging Face: 2.8T-Parameter, 104B-Active MoE in MXFP4 at About 1.56TB, Custom License Limits Large Model-as-a-Service Use

Key Takeaways

  • Architecture: 93 layers (1 dense), 69 KDA plus 24 Gated DSA attention layers, 896 experts with 16 selected per token plus 2 shared experts, and a 401M MoonViT-V2 vision encoder.
  • Compared with K3, the full-attention Gated MLA layers are replaced with Gated DeepSeek Sparse Attention for more efficient long-context modeling.
  • Vendor-reported scores on the model card: Terminal-Bench 4.0 65.7 (Opus 5.5 66.4), SWE Marathon v1.1 51.7 (Opus 5.5 46.3), HLE-Full with tools 70.0 and BrowseComp 92.1; ProgramBench 31.5 trails Opus 5.5 at 65.0.
  • License: a Model-as-a-Service business with over $20M revenue in any 12 months needs a separate agreement with Moonshot, and products above 100M monthly users or $20M monthly revenue must prominently display "Kimi K3.1-Pro"; internal use is exempt from both.
Read full story

Fireworks Forge Launches: Ultra-fast Inference Preview Hits 1,500 Tokens/s, Half-Price Background Mode, Nexus Desktop for Codex and Claude Desktop, Sovereign Private Preview

At its first Forge conference on November 3, open-model inference platform Fireworks launched a batch of products. Ultra-fast, powered by NVIDIA Blackwell, is in public preview at up to 1,500 tokens per second on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, cutting a 30-turn agent task from 1 minute to 8 seconds. Background Mode runs deferrable work at half price, alongside multi-day prompt caching and higher rate limits. Nexus Desktop brings open-model routing into the Codex app, Claude Desktop and OpenCode, with Pro plans from $8 per month. Fireworks also announced No Eval, serverless LoRA inference, the Fireworks Sovereign private preview and a 60+ partner Frontier Ecosystem.

Fireworks Forge Launches: Ultra-fast Inference Preview Hits 1,500 Tokens/s, Half-Price Background Mode, Nexus Desktop for Codex and Claude Desktop, Sovereign Private Preview

Key Takeaways

  • Ultra-fast public preview: on NVIDIA Blackwell, up to 1,500 tokens per second on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash; in Fireworks' benchmark a 30-turn agent task fell from 1 minute to 8 seconds (Fireworks blog)
  • Cost options: Background Mode runs deferrable work at half price; multi-day prompt caching cuts the cost of resuming long context; higher serverless rate limits and Elastic Burst are generally available
  • Nexus Desktop launches: personalized routing across open and closed models inside the Codex app, Claude Desktop and OpenCode; Pro from $8 per month, Teams from $10 per seat per month
  • Training: No Eval (private preview) turns production traces into task evals; serverless LoRA inference (public preview) starts with GLM 5.3 Flash at per-token pricing with no idle charge; free training on Muse Glimmer 30B through November 30
  • Enterprise: Fireworks Sovereign (private preview) runs the inference engine in a customer's own cloud or data center; Fireworks says it already manages over 25,000 GPUs in customer environments; plus a 60+ partner Frontier Ecosystem
Read full story

X Discussion: Grok Bot Engineer poteto Calls Adversarial Agent Code Reviews "Mostly a Waste of Tokens" and Argues for Empirical Plus Formal Verification Instead

On November 3, @poteto (lauren), whose bio says she works on Grok @bot at SpaceXSI, is on the React Compiler core team, and previously worked at Cursor, Meta and Netflix, posted what she called "maybe a hot take": she now considers adversarial reviews mostly a waste of tokens and thinks those tokens are far better spent on empirical combined with formal verification. She says she has updated her agent skill pack pstack to use its interrogate (multi-model adversarial review) skill less and may eventually remove it. She adds that she has found very little value in code review in the abstract, because agents tend to get lost in nitpicks and YAGNIs. The post drew about 906K views, 9,227 likes and 5,538 bookmarks. It is a personal opinion that sparked debate over the value of AI code review.

Key Takeaways

  • Opinion (personal, not an official finding): adversarial reviews are "mostly a waste of tokens"; empirical plus formal verification is the better use of them
  • Action: the author says she has made pstack use the interrogate skill less and may remove it; at fetch time the public pstack folder in GitHub cursor/plugins had no commits after October 27, so the change is not visible there yet
  • What interrogate is: per its public SKILL.md, it spawns one read-only reviewer per configured model (defaults Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh and Grok 4.7 xhigh fast) to attack the diff, then sorts findings into Act on, Consider, Noted and Dismissed without auto-applying fixes
  • Author (per her X and GitHub bios): engineer on Grok Bot at SpaceXSI, React Compiler core team, previously at Cursor, Meta and Netflix
  • Reach: about 906K views, 9,227 likes, 5,538 bookmarks, 668 replies, 356 reposts and 210 quotes
Read full story

Anthropic Open-Sources FlashProve: zkSNARK Proofs That a Reply Came From the Committed Model, About 110 Tokens/s for 400B Llama 4 Maverick on One H100

Anthropic's Frontier Red Team published a research post on November 2 and open-sourced FlashProve under Apache 2.0. A model provider commits to hidden weights once, then attaches a zero-knowledge proof to each reply, so a user without the weights can check on an ordinary CPU that the reply really came from that model. That targets routing services that quietly swap in cheaper models and tampered token streams. Anthropic reports about 110 tokens/s on one H100 for Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE, 4-bit), proofs of about 19 MB per 1,024-token request, and roughly 70-95x the GPU time of vLLM inference. It is an unmaintained research prototype limited to 1,024-token contexts and greedy decoding of an integer version of the model. Anthropic engineer Steve Weis shared the release on X.

Anthropic Open-Sources FlashProve: zkSNARK Proofs That a Reply Came From the Committed Model, About 110 Tokens/s for 400B Llama 4 Maverick on One H100

Key Takeaways

  • Anthropic-reported: on Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE, 4-bit) one H100 proves about 110 tokens/s (prefill, 24 requests per batch), with proofs of about 19 MB per 1,024-token request.
  • It is costly: roughly 70-95x the GPU time of vLLM inference; the performance page lists about 270 GB of host memory for serving and about 39 minutes to commit to a set of weights.
  • Verification needs no GPU: the C++ verifier checks a proof in about 21 seconds on one thread, and a slower Lean verifier plus Lean 4 proofs of the security theorem are included.
  • Against prior work: VerInf proved the same model at about 0.02 tokens/s; the commercial Attestable reached 53-77 tokens/s on Gemma 4 31B but has no open-source release.
  • Limits: v0.16.0 is an unmaintained research prototype with 1,024-token contexts, greedy decoding of an integer model only, and no architecture hiding.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

X Discussion: levelsio Used Claude Code to Decompile the Battlefield 1942 Demo and Put It in the Browser With Multiplayer, Citing About 1M Output Tokens

Indie developer Pieter Levels (@levelsio) said on X on November 2 that he used Claude Code to decompile the engine of the free Battlefield 1942 demo, port it to C, compile it to WebAssembly and host it at bf1942.pieter.com, where it runs in the browser with online co-op on the Tobruk map. He said the job took about 1 million output tokens, roughly $100 at API prices, while he pays for a $100-a-month Claude subscription. His two main posts drew about 2,200 likes and 340,000 views and reached X trending. These are the author's own claims and community discussion, not independently verified.

X Discussion: levelsio Used Claude Code to Decompile the Battlefield 1942 Demo and Put It in the Browser With Multiplayer, Citing About 1M Output Tokens

Key Takeaways

  • Author's account: Claude Code decompiled the Battlefield 1942 demo engine, which was ported to C and compiled to WebAssembly to run in the browser.
  • The live build at bf1942.pieter.com opens directly, is labeled non-commercial and unofficial, and offers online co-op on Tobruk with no install.
  • Cost: about 1 million output tokens by the author's count, roughly $100 at API prices; he actually pays for a $100-a-month Claude subscription.
  • He said it was much harder than his earlier Quake and DOOM ports, whose engine source code id Software released long ago.
  • Reach: the first post had about 1,100 likes and 230,000 views, the launch post about 1,100 likes and 107,000 views; testers are already reporting bugs.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

X Discussion: Former Claude Code Member Thariq Says the $200 Plans Are Enough and "This Is the Most Expensive Intelligence Will Ever Be"

Thariq (@trq212), whose X bio reads "formerly Claude Code @anthropicai", posted on November 2: "one week in my takeaway is that you don't need unlimited tokens to do great work, the $200 plans are amazing and this is the most expensive intelligence will ever be." Within about seven hours the post drew more than 5,500 likes, 240,000 views and 350+ replies. Supporters say flat-rate plans are enough for most developers; critics point out the tension between "no unlimited tokens" and recommending the top tier, and some worry prices will rise once subsidies end. This is a personal view, not an Anthropic statement.

Key Takeaways

  • Thariq's exact claim: you don't need unlimited tokens to do great work, the $200 plans are "amazing", and "this is the most expensive intelligence will ever be."
  • In replies he added that he has been using the plans on weekends for a while and has "never hit a real limit."
  • Claude's official pricing page lists Max at $100/month (5x Pro usage) and Ultra at $200/month (10x Pro usage, no 5-hour limit, $200/month in API credits).
  • Pushback centers on two points: the tension between "no unlimited tokens" and recommending the most expensive tier, and whether current prices depend on subsidies that may end.
  • This is a personal view from a former Anthropic team member, not an official Anthropic position, and it comes with no usage data.
Read full story
ADSponsored

X Discussion: Jason Calacanis Says Under $40K a Year in AI Subscriptions Delivers $2M+ in Value and Has Automated at Least Seven Full-Time Jobs

Angel investor and This Week in Startups host Jason Calacanis posted on X on November 2 that he spends under $40K a year on tokens and subscriptions from Anthropic, Lovable, Grok Bot, ElevenLabs and other AI products, yet gets more than $2M in value at LAUNCH and This Week in Startups. He said they have automated at least seven full-time jobs and become 100% faster at the average task, and that the last 90 days changed more than the previous two years. Within about 9 hours the post drew about 2,200 likes and 230K views, with debate centered on AI ROI and job replacement. All figures are his own claims and have not been independently verified.

Key Takeaways

  • This is Calacanis's personal post, not official data or an announcement from any AI company; the $40K, $2M, seven jobs and 100% faster figures are self-reported with no public breakdown.
  • The original post (2026-11-02 05:27 UTC) had about 2,201 likes, 106 reposts, 244 replies, 42 quotes, 230K views and 715 bookmarks at fetch time.
  • Tools he named include Anthropic, Lovable, Grok Bot and ElevenLabs plus a long tail of other products; he also said anyone who has not used the last 90 days of products for at least 30 hours a week has no idea how profound this software is.
  • Supporters: entrepreneur Steven Cohn (@spcohn) quoted it saying his team has seen the same level of ROI; Farzad (@farzyness), with about 400K followers, quoted it saying "The ROI for AI is mind-boggling," drawing about 157 likes.
  • Skeptics: one user mocked posting "we automated seven full-time jobs" with a siren emoji like a product launch, noting that 30 hours a week of usage is itself like a new full-time job.
Read full story

Meituan ships LongCat-2.5, a 1.6T-parameter (about 48B active) native multimodal agentic model, with API pricing of $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens

On Nov 2 Meituan's LongCat team listed LongCat-2.5 in its API platform change log as the full release of September 25's LongCat-2.5-Preview. The official technical blog says it has 1.6 trillion total parameters with about 48 billion activated per token, builds on LongCat-2.0 with stronger native visual understanding and agentic coding, and was trained and served with W4A4 inference on domestic AI accelerators. Vendor-reported scores include 88.4 on Terminal Bench v2.1, 38.5 on Terminal Bench v4.0, 91.9 on BrowseComp and 83.1 on MCP Atlas. The API speaks both OpenAI and Anthropic formats with a 1M-token context and up to 128K output tokens, at a limited-time price of $0.30 per 1M uncached input tokens, $0.006 cached input and $1.20 output.

Meituan ships LongCat-2.5, a 1.6T-parameter (about 48B active) native multimodal agentic model, with API pricing of $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: a 1.6-trillion-parameter MoE with about 48B active per token, a 1M-token context and up to 128K output tokens (official blog, API docs)
  • Code agents (vendor-reported): Terminal Bench v2.1 88.4 (Claude Opus 5 89.1, GPT-5.6-Sol 88.8), Terminal Bench v4.0 38.5 (GPT-5.6-Sol 37.3, Claude Opus 5 53.9), DeepSWE v1.1 64.6
  • General agents (vendor-reported): BrowseComp 91.9, MCP Atlas 83.1, AutomationBench v1.0.6 51.8, HLE with tools 63.1; AutomationBench jumps from 15.8 on LongCat-2.0
  • Pricing: limited-time $0.30 per 1M uncached input tokens, $0.006 cached input and $1.20 output (pricing page)
  • Engineering: W4A4 inference raises prefill throughput 43.3% and decode throughput 42.77% over a W8A8 baseline; FSDP gives 86% higher per-device throughput than DDP in long-sequence SFT
Read full story

SenseTime open-sources SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, a 9B looped Transformer with about 14.6B inference parameters for long-context and agentic work

On Oct 30, SenseTime released SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview (Apache 2.0) on its official X account and Hugging Face. It runs layers 4 to 27 of a 32-layer decoder twice with the same weights, so each forward pass executes 56 layer computations while storing about 9B parameters, about 14.6B at inference, and it uses two-stream mHC (manifold-constrained hyper-connections) to manage the residual streams. It takes text and images, with training sequences up to 262,144 tokens. SenseTime charts show it beating Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 peers on BIRD-Dev, WorkBuddy Bench, and other agent and data tasks, while it still trails on Terminal Bench 2.1; the technical report is not out yet. The official launch post drew about 910 likes.

SenseTime open-sources SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, a 9B looped Transformer with about 14.6B inference parameters for long-context and agentic work

Key Takeaways

  • Structure: 32 distinct decoder layers, with layers 4 to 27 looped twice on shared weights for 56 layer computations per forward pass; about 9B stored and about 14.6B inference parameters (model card)
  • Vendor-reported scores: BIRD-Dev 71.38 (Qwen3.5-27B 69.84), WorkBuddy Bench 66.89 (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 61.98), AutomationBench 13.72 (Qwen3.5-27B 10.17)
  • Weak spots from the same vendor chart: Terminal Bench 2.1 at 40.45, below Qwen3.6-27B at 47.19; tau3-Banking at 18.56, slightly below Qwen3.5-27B at 19.59
  • Training context up to 262,144 tokens; hybrid attention uses three linear-attention layers plus one full-attention layer per four-layer group; MTP speedup is available, DSpark and DFlash2 are still training
  • Apache 2.0, requires trust_remote_code=True; official examples cover Transformers 5.18.0, a 4-GPU LightLLM setup, and an SGLang PR, and the technical report is still to come
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview⚡ Qwen3.5-27B⚡ Qwen3.6-35B-A3B🌐 SenseTime
O
OpenAIhelp.openai.com·
👀70
🔥83

OpenAI will pool ChatGPT and Codex into one token-based usage allowance starting in December for Plus, Pro, and Business; Instant chat is excluded

On Oct 31, OpenAI's Help Center added a page titled "Understanding ChatGPT and Codex usage limits": starting in December, the usage allowance on Plus, Pro, and Business plans will be shared across ChatGPT and Codex as OpenAI brings the agentic capabilities of Work into the main ChatGPT experience. Usage will be measured in tokens, so stronger models and more complex tasks use more; Instant chat will not draw from the allowance. Users will see combined remaining usage and reset times in Settings > Usage, and can wait for a reset, upgrade, or buy credits when they run out. OpenAI says it expects most users will not need to wait for resets more often than they do now, but it has not given an exact start date or per-plan allowances. The news drew strong concern from Plus users on X.

Key Takeaways

  • Timing: takes effect in December, exact date not announced; covers Plus, Pro, and Business plans (OpenAI Help Center)
  • Metering: everything is measured in tokens and Instant chat is excluded; the Business pricing page now also notes that plan usage will have a shared limit across ChatGPT and Codex starting in December (Business pricing)
  • Today's baseline: only Work and Codex share an allowance now; Plus is estimated at 5-45 local messages per 5 hours on GPT-6 Astra, 15-160 on GPT-6.1 Sol, and 350-3,000 on GPT-6 Luna (official estimates, help article)
  • Pro 100/200/500 currently have no 5-hour limit in Work and Codex; per-plan allowances after the merge have not been published
  • OpenAI's position: most users should not wait for resets more often than today; when out, wait, upgrade, or buy credits
Read full story
A
Anthropic (Claude Help Center)support.claude.com·
👀22
🔥82

Anthropic extends Claude text watermarking to older models including Mythos 5, Opus 4.7/4.6 and Sonnet 4.6, reportedly from November 3

Anthropics help center article "How Claude marks AI-generated content" (updated Oct 28) now lists older models released before Aug 2, 2026, including Claude Mythos 5, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6, Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.6 and Sonnet 4.5, as carrying text watermarks on first-party surfaces, and says Anthropic is adding watermarks to these models to meet EU AI Act Article 50 transparency duties. According to a customer email screenshot reported by outlets such as MACCUS, the legacy rollout starts Nov 3, with Amazon Bedrock possibly a few days later; Anthropics public pages do not state that date. The watermark follows Google DeepMinds SynthID-Text approach, adds no hidden characters or extra tokens, and detection is in private preview only for regulators, media, researchers and similarly obligated organizations, which has drawn complaints on X that users cannot check their own text.

Anthropic extends Claude text watermarking to older models including Mythos 5, Opus 4.7/4.6 and Sonnet 4.6, reportedly from November 3

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: in the official support table, older models such as Mythos 5, Opus 4.7/4.6/4.5 and Sonnet 4.6/4.5 are ticked only for first-party text watermarks; cloud-partner watermarks and C2PA file credentials remain limited to models launched after Aug 2 (see the help center)
  • Timing: a customer email reported by media puts the start at Nov 3, with Bedrock possibly a few days later (MACCUS); Anthropics public pages give no date
  • Cost and quality: Anthropic says the watermark adds no characters, no extra tokens and no extra cost, using a variant of SynthID-Text (see Anthropics explainer)
  • Detection: the detection API is in private preview for regulators, law enforcement, media, fact-checkers, researchers and obligated enterprises; ordinary users cannot check text yet
  • Reach: watermarks apply worldwide across Claude, the Claude Platform API, Claude Code, Cowork and Tag, because Anthropic says it has no durable way to scope them by region yet
Read full story