AI Coding Live News

SenseTime open-sources SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, a 9B looped Transformer with about 14.6B inference parameters for long-context and agentic work

On Oct 30, SenseTime released SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview (Apache 2.0) on its official X account and Hugging Face. It runs layers 4 to 27 of a 32-layer decoder twice with the same weights, so each forward pass executes 56 layer computations while storing about 9B parameters, about 14.6B at inference, and it uses two-stream mHC (manifold-constrained hyper-connections) to manage the residual streams. It takes text and images, with training sequences up to 262,144 tokens. SenseTime charts show it beating Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 peers on BIRD-Dev, WorkBuddy Bench, and other agent and data tasks, while it still trails on Terminal Bench 2.1; the technical report is not out yet. The official launch post drew about 910 likes.

SenseTime open-sources SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, a 9B looped Transformer with about 14.6B inference parameters for long-context and agentic work

Key Takeaways

  • Structure: 32 distinct decoder layers, with layers 4 to 27 looped twice on shared weights for 56 layer computations per forward pass; about 9B stored and about 14.6B inference parameters (model card)
  • Vendor-reported scores: BIRD-Dev 71.38 (Qwen3.5-27B 69.84), WorkBuddy Bench 66.89 (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 61.98), AutomationBench 13.72 (Qwen3.5-27B 10.17)
  • Weak spots from the same vendor chart: Terminal Bench 2.1 at 40.45, below Qwen3.6-27B at 47.19; tau3-Banking at 18.56, slightly below Qwen3.5-27B at 19.59
  • Training context up to 262,144 tokens; hybrid attention uses three linear-attention layers plus one full-attention layer per four-layer group; MTP speedup is available, DSpark and DFlash2 are still training
  • Apache 2.0, requires trust_remote_code=True; official examples cover Transformers 5.18.0, a 4-GPU LightLLM setup, and an SGLang PR, and the technical report is still to come
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview⚡ Qwen3.5-27B⚡ Qwen3.6-35B-A3B🌐 SenseTime

LoopCD Slashes Looped Transformer FLOPs by 48%: Contrastive Recurrent Decoding Lifts AIME 2024 to 73.3%

Looped Transformers achieve dramatic parameter efficiency by repeatedly executing a single shared block across recurrent cycles. However, standard autoregressive decoding discards all intermediate recurrent states, utilizing only the final pass. Researchers from UT Austin, Princeton, and collaborators introduce LoopCD, a training-free contrastive decoding framework. By contrasting final recurrent predictions with early-stage weaker passes in logit space (LoopCD-Logits) or hidden space with zero output pass overhead (LoopCD-Hidden), LoopCD raises Ouro-2.6B-Thinking's AIME 2024 Pass@1 from 61.88% to 73.33% and Huginn's HumanEval Pass@1 from 22.56% to 31.71%. Crucially, LoopCD allows halving recurrent loops while outperforming full-depth unguided baselines, reducing forward FLOPs by 22.5% to 48.2%.

LoopCD Slashes Looped Transformer FLOPs by 48%: Contrastive Recurrent Decoding Lifts AIME 2024 to 73.3%

Key Takeaways

  • Introduces LoopCD for looped transformers, turning discarded intermediate states into zero-cost contrastive guidance
  • Drives Ouro-2.6B-Thinking AIME 2024 Pass@1 from 61.88% to 73.33% and lifts Huginn HumanEval from 22.56% to 31.71%
  • Enables halving recurrent loop counts while outperforming full-depth baselines, slashing forward FLOPs by 22.5% to 48.2%
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

Tsinghua Open-Sources TaH2: Adaptive Looped Transformers Boost Test-Time Scaling Slope by 53% on AIME

While looped transformers achieve high parameter efficiency by iteratively recycling layers for latent compute, fixed-depth looping expends redundant iterations on simple tokens and suffers from performance saturation. Tsinghua University's NICS lab developed TaH2, an adaptive looped framework that co-trains the backbone and an iteration decider via lookahead depth supervision. Evaluated on the rigorous AIME competition benchmarks, TaH2 accelerates the accuracy-compute scaling slope by 53% (2.74 vs 1.79) and surpasses non-looped baselines by +3.4 to +3.9 points at matched test-time compute.

Tsinghua Open-Sources TaH2: Adaptive Looped Transformers Boost Test-Time Scaling Slope by 53% on AIME

Key Takeaways

  • Adaptive Looping via Lookahead Depth Supervision: Discards rigid, uniform layer looping by training a lightweight iteration decider using online labels that predict whether subsequent recurrent passes genuinely improve token predictions.
  • 53% Steeper Test-Time Compute Scaling Slope: On challenging AIME competition benchmarks, improves the accuracy-to-compute slope from 1.79 to 2.74, outpacing non-looped baselines by +3.4 points at matched decoding FLOPs.
  • Overcoming Looping Saturation: While existing recurrent transformers plateau beyond shallow depths, TaH2's performance margin over dense models expands continuously from +2.8 points at depth 2 to +3.9 points at depth 8.
  • Complete Codebase Open-Sourced: Full post-training recipes, decider checkpoints, and inference evaluation harnesses released at github.com/thu-nics/TaH.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

TechCrunch/The Information: Astra uses recurrent-depth reasoning; safety experts warn CoT monitoring gets harder

Per The Information, reported by TechCrunch and The Verge, OpenAI's upcoming Astra uses “recurrent depth” (also called opaque recurrence / a looped transformer): cycling computation through internal layers before output, leaving fewer legible natural-language chain-of-thought traces. That can boost performance while making misbehavior harder to monitor. Redwood's Ryan Greenblatt called it potentially “the single worst development for AI security/safety to date”; Zvi Mowshowitz and others warned of a race to the bottom on monitorability. OpenAI says use is limited and CoT remains legible; chief scientist Jakub Pachocki stressed CoT monitoring and said Astra's compute depth is within about a factor of two of GPT-4. TechCrunch says a Wednesday-morning Information follow-up reported Anthropic and Google DeepMind are already discussing the technique.

Key Takeaways

  • Astra reportedly uses recurrent depth / opaque recurrence, harder-to-read internal reasoning
  • Safety researchers fear a monitorability race to the bottom; OpenAI says use is limited with CoT monitoring
  • Follow-up: Anthropic and DeepMind are already discussing the technique
Read full story
ADSponsored