On Nov 2, semiconductor and AI research firm SemiAnalysis released GDPx, a benchmark of agentic capability across 11 domains: chip design, cybersecurity, biology, finance, legal, quant trading, recursive self-improvement (RSI), hardware design, materials science, alignment and software engineering. Its 206 tasks were built by 14 specialist data partners, with SemiAnalysis doing final QA. On the official leaderboard Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 12.0%, followed by Gemini 4 Carbon at 10.9% and GPT-6 Astra at 9.6%; nearly every model scores 0 on finance and legal. SemiAnalysis says safety classifiers drag down Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, and plans a new version every 3–6 months. All scores are as reported by SemiAnalysis.
Key Takeaways
- ✓Scale: 11 domains, 14 data partners and 206 tasks, with a default time limit of 8 hours per task (GDPx site)
- ✓Leaderboard (as reported by SemiAnalysis): Claude Opus 5.5 12.0%, Gemini 4 Carbon 10.9%, GPT-6 Astra 9.6%, Muse Wonder Full 9.0%, Claude Fable 5.1 8.5%, GPT 6.1 Sol 8.4%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2%
- ✓Lower tier and open weights: DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 5.4%, GPT-6 Luna 5.1%, Grok 4.7 3.9%, GLM 5.3 2.7%; almost every model scores 0 on finance and legal
- ✓Method: each model runs in its native harness where one exists (Claude Code for Opus, Codex for Astra, Antigravity for Carbon), otherwise OpenCode; the headline is pass@1 over three attempts with all domains weighted equally (SemiAnalysis blog)
- ✓By domain: Opus 5.5 wins quant trading, hardware and chip design; Gemini 4 Carbon wins biology and software engineering; GPT-6 Astra wins RSI and materials science; Muse Wonder Full is the strongest cyber model

Key Decision Metrics at a Glance
Turn your technical choice into a development budget
Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions
Project Links & Resources
Direct AccessIn-Depth Technical Analysis
Background and the problem
OpenAI's GDPval, released in September 2025, is still the general "knowledge work" benchmark most often reported on model release cards, but its tasks are one-shot and non-interactive: a few hundred words of instructions and an attachment, then the model writes a document. SemiAnalysis argues that this format predates agents and no longer separates today's frontier models, while many popular leaderboards are close to saturated. It also argues that the first trillion dollars of AI revenue will come from sectors that can deploy frontier intelligence at high ROI, so GDPx covers just 11 domains such as chip design, cyber, biology, finance, legal, quant trading and RSI, and deliberately skips government, real estate and insurance.
How it works
Each domain was built with at least one specialist RL environment company: Arithmetic built cyber tasks from proprietary zero-days in open-source software, Fleet built alignment tasks and Datacurve built software engineering tasks, with SemiAnalysis doing final QA and iteration. Tasks come with simulated work environments and a default 8-hour limit. Models run in their native harness where possible (Claude Code for Opus 5.5, Codex for GPT-6 Astra, Antigravity for Gemini 4 Carbon) and otherwise in OpenCode. Grading mixes binary and partial credit by domain; the headline is pass@1 over three attempts, with domains weighted equally.
Benchmarks and numbers
All figures are from the SemiAnalysis leaderboard: Claude Opus 5.5 12.0%, Gemini 4 Carbon 10.9%, GPT-6 Astra 9.6%, Muse Wonder Full 9.0%, Claude Fable 5.1 8.5%, GPT 6.1 Sol 8.4%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2%, Gemini 4 Argon 7.3%, DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 5.4%, GPT-6 Luna 5.1%, Grok 4.7 3.9% and GLM 5.3 2.7%. Nearly every model scores 0 on finance and legal. SemiAnalysis notes that Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra trip safety classifiers in cyber, biology and alignment, which lowers their overall scores. The results have not yet been reproduced by a third party.
Getting started
Don't pick a model on the headline number alone: the site lets you filter by domain and by average cost per task and shows the Pareto frontier. SemiAnalysis's read is that GPT-6 Luna and DeepSeek compete at the low end, Opus wins the high end and OpenAI holds the middle, and that safety classifiers matter for cyber work. A top score of 12% is also a reminder that long, real-environment tasks still need human checkpoints. Data vendors and labs can contact [email protected] to join the next version.
Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.
Discussion & Comments
0Sign in to join the discussion
Connect with AI developers to exchange benchmark insights.