AI Coding Live News

Flower Labs Releases Endeavor 1.1: Multimodal, EU-Only Inference and Private Deployment With Readable Thinking Traces, Claims Parity With OpenAI and Anthropic

Flower Labs, the company behind the Flower federated learning framework, released Endeavor 1.1 on November 3, its third model this year after the UK sovereign 7B model Lizzy in April and Endeavor 1.0 in September. The update adds image input, an optional EU-only GPU inference tier, and Flower-managed, private-cloud or on-premises deployment, and promises readable thinking traces plus ownership of outputs that customers may use to train their own models. Vendor-reported scores are GPQA 94.4, HumanEval 99.9, AIME 2026 99.9 and MMMU-Pro 81.1, but the comparison uses GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 rather than either lab's newest models, and access is request-only for now.

Flower Labs Releases Endeavor 1.1: Multimodal, EU-Only Inference and Private Deployment With Readable Thinking Traces, Claims Parity With OpenAI and Anthropic

Key Takeaways

  • Vendor-reported: GPQA rose from 92.0 in 1.0 to 94.4 (about 30% fewer errors), HumanEval from 98.2 to 99.9; IFEval is 94.5 and MMMU-Pro 81.1.
  • In the vendor table, GPT-5.6 Sol scores GPQA 94.1, IFEval 95.9 and MMMU-Pro 83.0, and Claude Fable 5 scores GPQA 92.6; Endeavor does not lead on IFEval or MMMU-Pro.
  • New EU-only GPU inference with SLAs, with UK, Middle East, Asia and Africa regions planned.
  • The pitch is control: raw thinking traces, ownership of outputs and traces, and the right to fine-tune or train your own models on them.
  • Flower says the model builds on mature open-weight models via continual pre-training, targeted post-training and model integration, without naming the base or parameter count; access is request-only.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Endeavor 1.1⚡ Endeavor 1.0⚡ GPT-5.6 Sol⚡ Claude Fable 5⚡ Kimi K3⚡ Nemotron 3 Ultra🌐 Flower Labs
g
guregodevo (Memdoor author)github.com·
👀18
🔥81

Memdoor reproduces GVS5H: a team of five Qwen3.8-27B agents averages 9.8/10 on the first 10 LiveCodeBench Hard problems, against 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call

On Oct 31 the open-source coding agent Memdoor (GitHub guregodevo/memdoor, Apache 2.0) published its team-solve workflow: using the GVS5H paper authors' exact prompts and loop, five Qwen3.8-27B instances act as planner, two ideators, solver and manager, talk only through files on disk, and a script that runs the tests decides success. Over five passes on the first 10 LiveCodeBench Hard problems from the GVS5H list it averaged 9.8/10, against 9.6 for the authors' own harness and 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call; 49 of 50 runs solved the problem for $35.79 in total, and every request and reply is public. The Hacker News post has about 200 points. This is a community reproduction on only 10 problems, and the author notes that training-data contamination cannot be ruled out.

Key Takeaways

  • Score: a mean of 9.8/10 over five passes (10, 10, 10, 10, 9), against 9.6 for the GVS5H authors' own harness and 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call (team-solve README, project-reported)
  • Cost: 49 of 50 runs solved, $35.79 and 15.3M output tokens in total; a median run took about 40 minutes of model time and $0.39, the longest 4 hours
  • Method: five roles (planner, two ideators, solver, manager) plus a repair worker each start from a fresh context, talk only through files on disk, and a shell script that runs the tests decides success instead of a model
  • Limits: only 10 problems rather than the paper's 100; the contests date from March and April 2025 and may be in training data; Fable 5's column comes from the GVS5H authors' result files and was not rerun in this harness
  • Reach: the HN post has about 200 points as of Nov 1, 16:10 SGT; the original GVS5H paper is arXiv 2608.26480, which reached #1 on HN on Oct 25
Read full story
x
xAIdocs.x.ai·
👀45
🔥82

xAI will add an invisible watermark to Grok API text by default from Nov 7, covering grok-4.7 and six other models, with per-model admin opt-out

On Oct 31, xAI (signed as SpaceXSI in its docs) added an "Output Watermarking" page to its API docs: starting November 7, 2026, text generated by grok-4.7, grok-4.6, grok-4.5, grok-4.3, and the reasoning, non-reasoning, and multi-agent versions of grok-4.20 will carry an invisible watermark by default, to comply with the EU AI Act. It covers ordinary text, structured outputs, and tool call arguments on both the Responses and Chat Completions APIs, and works by slightly shaping token choice without adding any characters. Developers can read the x-watermark response header to check; team admins can opt out per model in the Console, but must confirm a legal exception applies, and some models may be locked on.

Key Takeaways

  • Timing: on by default from November 7, 2026, with no code change and no request parameter (xAI docs)
  • Scope: 7 model IDs (grok-4.7, 4.6, 4.5, 4.3, and grok-4.20 reasoning, non-reasoning, and multi-agent) on the global and regional endpoints, across both Responses and Chat Completions
  • Coverage: ordinary text, structured outputs, and tool call arguments; the response header x-watermark: true marks a watermarked output
  • Opt-out: team admins switch it off per model, effective for new requests within 5 minutes and logged in the audit log; admins must confirm a legal exception applies, and some models are locked on
  • xAI's position: no effect on quality or speed; detection is statistical with three outcomes (watermarked, not watermarked, uncertain), and the detection API is by application
Read full story

YC Labs pits AI agent swarms in Minecraft and Mindustry: GPT swarms win 12 of 16 head-to-head games against Claude, while a 50-agent colony slides into bureaucracy

YC Labs, a research project at Y Combinator, and multi-agent environment startup Olam Labs published "Agents in Games" on Oct 29. Fifty GPT-6.1 Sol agents told to "build a thriving civilization" in survival Minecraft spent three hours huddled in shelters rationing food, sending about 5,900 messages and inventing ration ledgers, permits and job titles. In nine Bed Wars games, 10 GPT-6.1 Sol agents beat 10 Claude Opus 5.5 agents 6–3; in seven 50-vs-50 Mindustry matches lasting about 9.5 hours, GPT won 6–1. The leader was almost always whichever agent was listed first in the directory, and stuck GPT agents fetched the game's public source code on their own. The Minecraft harness is open source. These are one lab's experimental observations, not a standardized benchmark.

YC Labs pits AI agent swarms in Minecraft and Mindustry: GPT swarms win 12 of 16 head-to-head games against Claude, while a 50-agent colony slides into bureaucracy

Key Takeaways

  • Head-to-head: GPT-6.1 Sol won Bed Wars 6–3 over nine games and Mindustry 6–1 over seven, 12 of 16 overall (see the YC Labs report)
  • Civ50: 50 GPT agents sent about 5,900 messages in three hours; 22 of 34 deaths came on the first night, after which the colony turned cautious
  • No election: 46 of the other 49 agents first messaged Ada, first on the roster, who received 616 DMs and became leader
  • Communication: in one Bed Wars game GPT players sent 1,147 DMs versus Claude's 82; GPT drifted into compressed shorthand while Claude voted with "+1"
  • Open source: the long-running Minecraft agent harness is public at yc-software/minecraft-agent-harness
Read full story
ADSponsored

X discussion: Sam Altman calls DRAM sitting in personal PCs "quite terrible", and local-inference fans push back

On the Cheeky Pint podcast with Stripe co-founder John Collison, published October 29, Sam Altman discussed the memory shortage. He said many people assume open-source models and local inference solve the compute crunch, but from a global allocation perspective it is "quite terrible" for everyone to have scarce DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used about 5% of the time, and that a supply-constrained world wants maximum utilization in the cloud. A pubity post quoting him drew more than 26,000 likes and over 8 million views, and many users pushed back that PC memory is not only for AI and that local models matter for privacy and offline use. This is a summary of an X discussion, not a verified conclusion.

X discussion: Sam Altman calls DRAM sitting in personal PCs "quite terrible", and local-inference fans push back

Key Takeaways

  • Source: Sam Altman on the Cheeky Pint podcast, published October 29, with an official transcript that includes "being used 5% of the time"
  • Altman's argument: with DRAM supply tight, memory in personal computers sits mostly idle, while cloud data centers can serve many users continuously, so utilization should be maximized there
  • Engagement (X API, read Oct 31 13:06 SGT): the pubity post had 26,124 likes, 8,557 quotes, 5,210 replies and about 8.06 million views
  • Main pushback: PC memory also runs the OS, browsers and games; local models keep data on the device; some note the view matches OpenAI's cloud business model
  • Altman did not explain the 5% figure, and coverage suggests treating it as a rough estimate, not a measurement
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

Kaggle and IBM Research launch the ScarfBench Java migration leaderboard: Gemini 4 Argon with Antigravity leads at 75.2%, and about 72% of failures happen at runtime

Kaggle announced ScarfBench with IBM Research, a 204-task benchmark that tests whether coding agents can migrate enterprise Java apps between Jakarta EE, Quarkus and Spring without changing behavior. IBM's October 27 technical note shows Gemini 4 Argon with Antigravity first on the smoke score at 75.2%, Claude Opus 5.5 with Claude Code highest on all-tests-pass at 72.1%, and GPT-6.1 Sol with Codex cheapest at $1.25 per solved task.

Kaggle and IBM Research launch the ScarfBench Java migration leaderboard: Gemini 4 Argon with Antigravity leads at 75.2%, and about 72% of failures happen at runtime

Key Takeaways

  • 204 migration tasks and 10 model-plus-harness configurations; top smoke scores are Gemini 4 Argon + Antigravity 75.2%, Claude Opus 5.5 + Claude Code 70.5% and Claude Opus 5 + Claude Code 69.8% (IBM figures)
  • Claude Opus 5.5 + Claude Code has the highest all-tests-pass rate at 72.1%, just ahead of Gemini 4 Argon at 71.1%
  • Compiling is mostly solved: 8 of 10 configurations compiled at least 97% of solvable tasks, yet smoke scores spanned more than 50 points
  • 535 of 745 classified failing runs (about 72%) were runtime behavioral failures, including 210 lost-route/404 failures
  • Cost per solved task: $1.25 for GPT-6.1 Sol + Codex, $1.59 for Gemini 3.8 Flash + mini-swe and $10.10 for Claude Opus 5.5 + Claude Code; public submissions are not open yet
Read full story

Factory launches Droid 1.0: programmatic tool calling by default, hundreds of tool calls per model request, leads native harnesses on its own Terminal-Bench 4 runs

AI coding agent company Factory announced Droid 1.0 on X and its blog at 22:31 UTC on Oct 29, calling it the largest update yet to its agent harness. The key change makes programmatic tool calling (PTC) the default: the model writes a JavaScript program that runs up to hundreds of tool calls in a sandbox in one model request. In Factorys own Terminal-Bench 4 runs, Droid scored 57.6% with GPT-6.1 Sol ($0.79 per passed task) and 65.2% with Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.73), ahead of Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode and Devin on the same models.

Factory launches Droid 1.0: programmatic tool calling by default, hundreds of tool calls per model request, leads native harnesses on its own Terminal-Bench 4 runs

Key Takeaways

  • Programmatic tool calling is now the default: the model writes JavaScript that runs in a sandbox with no file, network or system access of its own, making up to hundreds of tool calls per request, with independent calls run concurrently
  • Factory example: moving and verifying 151 Linear issues took 312 tool calls; direct calls needed about 36 requests and 3.1M input tokens, a Script needed 2 requests and 61K tokens
  • Terminal-Bench 4 (Factory runs, Oct 23-28, three trials per task): with GPT-6.1 Sol, Droid 57.6% vs Codex 54.0%, OpenCode 51.0%, Devin 45.0%; with Opus 5.5, Droid 65.2% vs Cursor and OpenCode 62.1%, Devin 59.6%, Claude Code 57.6%
  • The first request shrank from 20,887 to 13,055 tokens (-37%) and up-front tool definitions went from 11 to 2; newly loaded MCP tools are appended to keep the prompt cache intact, and a typical production request reads 98% of input from cache
  • Available now as a macOS and Windows desktop app, a terminal UI and the Droid SDK (@factory/droid-sdk); the benchmarks are vendor-run with no third-party reproduction yet
Read full story

GitHub Agentic Workflows is generally available: write automation in Markdown, compile it to Actions YAML, run Copilot or your own coding agent, now with ARC self-hosting and micro-VM isolation

At Universe 2026 on Oct 28, GitHub made GitHub Agentic Workflows, an open source GitHub Next project, generally available on GitHub Free, Team and Enterprise. Developers describe tasks such as issue triage, CI failure analysis, documentation updates and test writing in natural-language Markdown, and gh aw compiles them into standard Actions YAML run by Copilot or a coding agent of their choice. GA adds self-hosted ARC runners with Docker-in-Docker, a non-experimental gh aw forecast cost estimate, per-workflow model providers and model routing, and Cloud Hypervisor or NVX micro-VM isolation.

GitHub Agentic Workflows is generally available: write automation in Markdown, compile it to Actions YAML, run Copilot or your own coding agent, now with ARC self-hosting and micro-VM isolation

Key Takeaways

  • Availability: GitHub Free, Team and Enterprise on github.com; using the default Copilot CLI engine requires a Copilot license
  • How it works: requirements in Markdown, compiled to standard Actions YAML that reuses existing runner groups and policies; run with Copilot or your own coding agent
  • Safe defaults: read-only permissions, a sandboxed container behind the Agent Workflow Firewall, safe-outputs validation, and a threat detection job before changes are applied
  • New at GA: self-hosted ARC runners with Docker-in-Docker, gh aw forecast out of experimental (with threat detection credits and monthly ranges), per-workflow model providers, model routing, micro-VM isolation and cross-repo enclaves
  • Customer story (Accenture's figures): one lead saved about 29 hours a week, AI authors 91% of the team's commits, and production errors fell from about 11,000 a day to under 1,000
Read full story

Google previews Connected Apps Platform: one MCP or Android AppFunctions integration for Gemini and Search

On Oct 28 Google launched a preview of its Connected Apps Platform. Developers integrate through a cloud-hosted MCP server or Android MCP (Jetpack AppFunctions), then register, test and submit for review in Google Connected Console, choosing whether the app goes live in Search, the Gemini app, or both. Access is phased and currently limited to US developers who apply.

Google previews Connected Apps Platform: one MCP or Android AppFunctions integration for Gemini and Search

Key Takeaways

  • Two integration paths: a cloud-hosted remote MCP server (authorized with OAuth 2.1), or Jetpack AppFunctions on Android (Android MCP), where tools run on the device
  • One console: Google Connected Console handles tool registration, testing, review and publishing, and shows traffic, latency and error rates once live
  • Distribution choice: before review, pick Search, the Gemini app, or both
  • Today: more than 50 Connected Apps across Search and Gemini; Adobe, Experian, Localiza and Peloton are live in Gemini and come to Search in the coming weeks, and Calm launches on both
  • Limits: phased preview for US developers who apply; Google has not said when it opens broadly
Read full story

Alphabet Q3 2026: revenue up 25% to $127.6B, Google Cloud up 103%, first-party model APIs near 32B tokens per minute

After the US market close on Oct 28, Alphabet reported Q3 2026 results: revenue rose 25% to $127.6B, and Google Cloud revenue more than doubled, up 103% to $30.7B, which the company attributes to enterprise AI infrastructure, AI solutions and TPU system sales. In the release and on X, Sundar Pichai said first-party model APIs now process nearly 32B tokens per minute, more than four times a year ago, and that the Gemini app has reached one billion users. The cost: Q3 capital expenditures of $51.4B and free cash flow of negative $9.1B.

Alphabet Q3 2026: revenue up 25% to $127.6B, Google Cloud up 103%, first-party model APIs near 32B tokens per minute

Key Takeaways

  • Revenue of $127.58B, up 25% year over year and the 13th straight quarter of double-digit growth; Pichai says Alphabet is on a $500B annual revenue run rate
  • Google Cloud revenue of $30.71B versus $15.16B a year ago, up 103%; Cloud operating income of $11.12B versus $3.59B
  • First-party model APIs process nearly 32B tokens per minute, more than 4x a year ago; Pichai's X post puts quarter-over-quarter growth at 40%
  • The Gemini app reached one billion users, which Google calls the fastest-growing product in its history; Search query growth is the highest in five years
  • Q3 capex of $51.36B versus $23.95B a year ago, and free cash flow of negative $9.07B, the second negative quarter in a row
Read full story
ADSponsored

Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5: 60% private test sets, Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58 and the open-weights gap widens to 12 points

On Oct 28 independent evaluator Artificial Analysis released Intelligence Index v5, its biggest revision since v4 in January: it adds Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench-Science, swaps Humanity's Last Exam for HLE-Diamond, and now draws 60% of its weight from private or held-out test sets. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 58, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 57 and GPT-6.1 Sol at 55; the top open-weights model, Kimi K3.1 Pro (weights not yet released), scores 46, widening the gap from 3 points in v4.3 to 12. It also launched Progress Index v1 for comparing models across years.

Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5: 60% private test sets, Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58 and the open-weights gap widens to 12 points

Key Takeaways

  • Overall (vendor-reported by Artificial Analysis): Claude Opus 5.5 (max) 58, GPT-6 Astra (max) 57, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) 55; Anthropic and OpenAI hold the top five, with Gemini 4 Argon (high) next at 50
  • The open-weights gap grows from 3 to 12 points: Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 46, while released-weight leaders DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM-5.3 (max) score 32, below Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) at 36
  • Cost per task varies more than 13x: among the top 10, GPT-6.1 Terra (max) is cheapest at $0.96 and Claude Fable 5.1 (max) priciest at $13.04; GPT-6.1 Sol trails Opus 5.5 by 4 points at about one eighth the cost ($1.27 vs $10.04)
  • Four categories at 25% each: Knowledge Work, Coding (FrontierCode 2.0 15%, Terminal-Bench 4.0 10%), Science and General; GDPval-AA v2.1, SciCode and AA-LCR were removed
  • Tasks are heavier: median output tokens per task rose from 35k to 59k, and effort matters more, with Opus 5.5 scoring 35 at low effort vs 58 at max for 10x the cost
Read full story

Cadence launches Maestro, a domain-specialized AI model portfolio for agentic chip and system design built in part on NVIDIA Nemotron, claiming up to 30% better results and 5x token efficiency

EDA leader Cadence announced the Maestro AI Model Portfolio on October 26: domain post-trained LLMs, trained decision models and self-improving agent skills that power its AuraStack, ChipStack, InnoStack and ViraStack AI Super Agents as they drive Cadence EDA and SDA tools. Cadence solvers score outputs against engineering constraints to close a reinforcement learning loop. Initial results per Cadence show up to 30% higher quality and up to 5x token efficiency versus a general-purpose foundation model. NVIDIA contributes Nemotron and OpenShell, and the stack runs on Cadence cloud, public cloud or on-premises. The first models reach select early access customers in Q4 2026.

Key Takeaways

  • Maestro is a portfolio, not one model: domain post-trained LLMs, decision models and self-improving agent skills, mixed with frontier and open-weight models per task
  • Deterministic solvers and EDA tools score outputs against engineering objectives and constraints, feeding a verified reinforcement learning loop
  • Per Cadence: up to 30% higher quality of results and up to 5x token efficiency versus a general-purpose foundation model; no third-party evaluation yet
  • NVIDIA supplies Nemotron models and the OpenShell sandbox reference architecture; customers can post-train on their own designs and run on-premises
  • First models go only to select early access customers in Q4 2026; Socionext expects up to 5x productivity from deploying InnoStack
Read full story

Anthropic publishes a 3-SAT algorithm found by an internal Claude research model: its paper and Lean 4 proof claim to refute the Exponential Time Hypothesis

Anthropic published the paper "A 2^o(n) Time Algorithm for 3-SAT" (credited to Claude, Anthropic) and an AI-written Lean 4 formalization in its official anthropics/formal-math GitHub repo. It claims a deterministic algorithm solves 3-SAT in 2^o(n) time, which would refute the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Anthropic's Levent Alpoge said on X that an internal Claude research model found the core algorithm on Oct 16 with 14M output tokens and no human input. The repo stresses the result is purely asymptotic and says nothing about solving formulas in practice.

Key Takeaways

  • The paper claims a deterministic algorithm decides 3-SAT on n variables in 2^o(n) time, refuting ETH, and solves the harder counting problem #3-SAT in 2^O(n log log n / sqrt(log n)) time
  • Per Levent Alpoge on X, an internal Claude research model found the core algorithm on Oct 16 with 14M output tokens and no human input; researchers then worked with Claude on the presentation
  • The Lean 4 proof was written by AI models and pins Lean and Mathlib v4.33.1; the README says it depends only on Lean's three standard axioms, and CI re-checks it with a second independent kernel, nanoda
  • The repo states the result is purely asymptotic and says nothing about solving formulas in practice; independent review by mathematicians is still pending
  • A day earlier OpenAI announced its own model-produced refutation of ETH; both claims are now under review
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

Replit launches Replit for Business, pitching an "Agent Habitat" where agents work inside company permissions, approvals and audit logs

In an Oct 26 post on Replit's blog, "The Rise of the Self-Driving Company," CEO Amjad Masad introduced Replit for Business. Its central idea is an Agent Habitat: a company-controlled environment where agents use the company's knowledge and systems and coordinate with people and other agents, while the company decides what they can access, when human approval is required, and how far mistakes can spread. The enterprise page lists SSO, SCIM, role-based access, bring-your-own-cloud, audit logs, isolated execution, security scanning, model controls and 510+ connectors. Masad says Replit engineers nearly tripled code output in the first half of 2026 while review times, reversions and incidents stayed flat (vendor figures).

Replit launches Replit for Business, pitching an "Agent Habitat" where agents work inside company permissions, approvals and audit logs

Key Takeaways

  • Internal numbers (per Replit): engineers nearly tripled code output in the first half of 2026 while review times, reversions and production incidents stayed flat
  • Customer case (vendor-reported): Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing (SMFL) says a process that needed six people for six months was done by one person in one week, and a project estimated at about JPY 3 billion is now expected to cost under JPY 1 billion
  • Enterprise controls: SAML SSO, SCIM, role-based access, BYOC, searchable audit logs, execution in isolated cloud environments, required security scans, Security Center and Auto-Protect, plus admin controls over which models are available
  • Ecosystem: the enterprise page lists 510+ connectors, Microsoft Fabric and Databricks Lakebase/Apps integration, and Microsoft Execution Containers to sandbox local builds in the Windows desktop app
  • Masad's view (opinion): by the end of 2030 every Fortune 500 company will be a "self-driving company"; a16z's Marc Andreessen endorsed the launch in a post the same day
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Terra: fast, low-cost computer use at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol

On Oct 26 OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra, an efficient model for visual reasoning, precise computer use and natural writing. It is rolling out today to Plus, Pro, Enterprise and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex, and in the API as gpt-6.1-terra. Standard API pricing is $1 input, $0.05 cached input and $5 output per million tokens, which OpenAI says is 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol, with a 1,050,000-token context window. By OpenAI's figures it scores 15 points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra on Agents' Last Exam at medium effort for about a third of the cost, and solves 50.3% of Terminal-Bench 4.0 at max effort.

OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Terra: fast, low-cost computer use at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol

Key Takeaways

  • Pricing (official docs): $1 input, $0.05 cached input, $1.25 for 30-minute cache writes and $5 output per million tokens; requests over 272K input tokens are billed at 2x input and 1.5x output; Batch/Flex are half price and Fast mode is 2x
  • Specs: 1,050,000-token context, 922,000 max input and 128,000 max output tokens, Jun 1 2026 knowledge cutoff; reasoning.effort from none to max, and tool calling requires the Responses API
  • Computer use (OpenAI figures): on Agents' Last Exam at medium effort it beats GPT-5.6 Terra by 15 points at about one-third the cost, and matches GPT-6 Astra at one-tenth the price per token; it finishes tasks over 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol
  • Coding and factuality (OpenAI figures): 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at max effort, more than double GPT-5.6 Terra's published 21.5%; error rate on an internal error-inducing prompt set fell from 53.6% to 16.7% at low effort
  • Safety: OpenAI says it meets the Critical cybersecurity threshold under its Preparedness Framework and keeps the safeguards built for GPT-6 Astra
Read full story